Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 1996)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 12 Dec 1996 02:06:36 GMT
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Street Bugs <strtbug@ibm.net>
Subject:      Fwd: FWD>reindeers (fwd) - As sc

>Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 00:44:07 -0500 >From: VWMANX@aol.com >To: jake@eurekanet.com, ae673@seorf.ohiou.edu, 74503.3164@compuserve.com, > fancher@ix.netcom.com (joncee.fancher), Porsche-Joerg@t-online.de, > slapschy@digi.e-technik.uni-kassel.de, mmclewis@meginc.com, > dclewis@seidata.com, lm.sjk@erinet.com, strtbug@ibm.net, > "inartctr"@inetdirect.net (indianapolisartcenter) >Subject: Fwd: FWD>reindeers (fwd) - As sc > >whhoosh.. >Watch out for them there flyin' deer parts >--------------------- >Forwarded message: >From: David_Helland@cpqm.mail.saic.com (David Helland) >To: lagrange@adnc.com (Linda La Grange), VWMANX@aol.com (Types OHIO), >Tamara_Beasley@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Tamara Beasley), >Ralph_Carolin@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Ralph Carolin), >Jean_Conrad@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Jean Conrad),= Rick__Doyle@cpqm.mail.saic.com >(Rick Doyle), Steve_Freyder@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Steve Freyder), >Sarah_Helland@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Sarah Helland), >Mark_Hunt@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Mark Hunt), DeeDee_Jones@cpqm.mail.saic.com >(DeeDee Jones), Tom_Kiester@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Tom Kiester), >Sandy_Lyon@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Sandy Lyon), Peter_Pyrune@cpqm.mail.saic.com >(Peter Pyrune), Jeff_Schramm@cpqm.mail.saic.com (Jeff Schramm) >Date: 96-12-10 17:27:22 EST > >Mail*Link=AE SMTP FWD>reindeers (fwd) - As science sees= them... > > > >IS THERE A SANTA CLAUS? >=20 > >As a result of an overwhelming lack of requests, and with research help= from >that renown scientific journal SPY magazine (January, 1990) - I am pleased= to >present the annual scientific inquiry into Santa Claus. >=20 > >1) No known species of reindeer can fly. BUT there are 300,000 species of >living organisms yet to be classified, and while most of these are insects >and germs, this does not COMPLETELY rule out flying reindeer which only= Santa >has ever seen. >=20 > >2) There are 2 billion children (persons under 18) in the world. >BUT since Santa doesn't (appear) to handle the Muslim, Hindu, Jewish and >Buddhist children, that reduces the workload to 15% of the total - 378 >million according to Population Reference Bureau. At an average (census) >rate of 3.5 children per household, that's 91.8 million homes. One= presumes >there's at least one good child in each. >=20 > >3) Santa has 31 hours of Christmas to work with, thanks to the different >time zones and the rotation of the earth, assuming he travels east to west >(which seems logical). This works out to 822.6 visits per second. >This is to say that for each Christian household with good children, Santa >has 1/1000th of a second to park, hop out of the sleigh, jump down the >chimney, fill the stockings, distribute the remaining presents under the >tree, eat whatever snacks have been left, get back up the chimney, get back >into the sleigh and move on to the next house. Assuming that each of these >91.8 million stops are evenly distributed around the earth (which, of= course, >we know to be false but for the purposes of our calculations we will= accept), >we are now talking about .78 miles per household, a total trip of 75-1/2 >million miles, not counting stops to do what most of us must do at least= once >every 31 hours, plus feeding and etc. >=20 > >This means that Santa's sleigh is moving at 650 miles per second, 3,000 >times the speed of sound. For purposes of comparison, the fastest man-= made >vehicle on earth, the Ulysses space probe, moves at a poky 27.4 miles per >second - a conventional reindeer can run, tops, 15 miles per hour. >=20 > >4) The payload on the sleigh adds another interesting element. Assuming >that each child gets nothing more than a medium-sized lego set (2 pounds), >the sleigh is carrying 321,300 tons, not counting Santa, who is invariably >described as overweight. On land, conventional reindeer can pull no more >than 300 pounds. Even granting that "flying reindeer" (see point #1) could >pull TEN TIMES the normal amount, we cannot do the job with eight, or even > >nine. We need 214,200 reindeer. This increases the payload - not even >counting the weight of the sleigh - to 353,430 tons. >Again, for comparison - this is four times the weight of the Queen= Elizabeth. >=20 > >5) 353,000 tons traveling at 650 miles per second creates enormous air >resistance - this will heat the reindeer up in the same fashion as >spacecraft re-entering the earth's atmosphere. The lead pair of reindeer >will absorb 14.3 QUINTILLION joules of energy. Per second. Each. In= short, >they will burst into flame almost instantaneously, exposing the reindeer >behind them, and create deafening sonic booms in their wake. >The entire reindeer team will be vaporized within 4.26 thousandths of a >second. Santa, meanwhile, will be subjected to centrifugal forces= 17,500.06 >times greater than gravity. A 250-pound Santa (which seems ludicrously= slim) >would be pinned to the back of his sleigh by 4,315,015 pounds of force. >=20 > >In conclusion - If Santa ever DID deliver presents on Christmas Eve, he's >dead now. > > > > > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.