Date:         Thu, 20 Feb 1997 09:41:26 -0700
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         "Morrell, Edward" <Edward_Morrell@jdedwards.com>
Subject:      FW: lowest mileage

All this debate- It's funny.  I feel good about the 107K on my 90 Carat,
seeing as I bought 2 years ago with only 52K on it-  driven Chicago to
Maine, Colorado, Florida twice, and even to work a few times.  But, I
still feel good about my '75 911S with 25K on it.  I think the key on
the Vanagon side is to own a driver, and then a Syncro in the stable
with almost no miles just in case...

One can only dream...
Ed
90 Carat 107K

>----------
>From: 	Ron Lussier[SMTP:coyote@zuni.chaco.com]
>Sent: 	Thursday, February 20, 1997 10:24 AM
>To: 	Multiple recipients of list
>Subject: 	Re: lowest mileage
>
>At 08:08 AM 2/20/97 -0600, Karen Winter wrote:
>>Gregory,
>>Well said I was thinking the same thing.
>>Vws are intended to be driven and admired, not stored away out of sight.
>>Drive them hard, but with care and enjoy them.
>
>Yeah, that's essentially how I feel.  I'm planning on taking my beautiful,
>low-mileage westie to South America and back.  (And the restoring it :-)
>
>Coyote
>--                                       
>Ron 'Coyote' Lussier         /\_/\      ____             Chaco Communications
>(408) 865-0657              (     )     \ _/__        10164 Parkwood Drive #8
>coyote@chaco.com             \   /       \X  /       Cupertino, CA 95014-1533
>(1990 VW Westfalia Camper)    \_/          \/    http://www.chaco.com/~coyote
>
>