Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 1997)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 11 Mar 1997 16:44:04 -0500 (EST)
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         KENYON FAIREY <kfairey@oit.umass.edu>
Subject:      Re: Wondering about Westfalia table heights.

I have owned both an '80 and '91 Westfalia.

In both vans, the table arrangement was identical - 2 swing arms, 2 tables: 1 small, 1 large. In the '91 model, VW shortened the door length to the rear hanging closet so it could be opened while the table was "stored" over the side bins, next to the stove cover.

Both swing arms are height adjustable to some degree. I found it rather simple to weing the larger table out of its stored position over the "cubbies" to get at stuff. Never thought it was a problem.

I never used the front table - just leave it at home! Then I use that wsing arm to boost myself up and get into the upper bunk - makes a nice step.

Only difference I ever noticed in the two models was the hanging closet door length adjustment and the difference in the tightening screw at the bottom of the table. Personally I thought the older one was more stable and would last longer. The steel in the '80 seemed stronger/heavier in the table swing arms and the roof lifting hardware. I am always afraid that I will bend the newer stuff!

Kenyon

> > My '85 came with one table. The height of the table was high enough to > fit either above the two top loading drawers next to rear seat or in the > front it could be slid partially above the stove leaving rear hatches > accessible. > > My '90 came with two tables. One the length of the '85 and one smaller. > Also the leg height of these tables are both shorter than the '85. The > main problem I see is that the larger '90 table must be stored in a way > that covers the rear hatches. Getting into these storage areas is less > convenient than before. Also, since I never travel with 4 people I don't > even need that smaller front table. > > My questions are: > > 1. Has anybody else noticed this? Any suggestions for improving this > situation? > > 2. Where and how is that smaller table supposed to be stored for travel? > I see in the owners manual how it is set up for use but there is no > picture for where it belongs during travel.. > > Thanks in advance. > -- > Jeff Feldstein Cisco Systems jfeldste@cisco.com >

-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kenyon Fairey, Re.D. Adjunct Assistant Professor Head, Help Desk Services & Human Dimensions of Resource Management Software Support Department of Forestry & Office of Information Technologies Wildlife Management - - - - - - - - - - - - - A 117, Lederle Graduate Research Center Internet -- KFairey@OIT.UMass.EDU University of Massachusetts Phone -- (413)-545-4366 Amherst, MA 01003 FAX -- (413)-545-3203


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.