Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1997)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 17 Jul 1997 09:52:47 -0800 (AKDT)
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Chris Wyatt <cwyatt@gi.alaska.edu>
Subject:      Re: Which Subaru engine?

Subaru put a 6 cylinder in some of their XT's, and called it the XT6. My mom drives an '89 XT6, with nearly 200,000 miles on it. The engine purrs like a cat on valium, and I believe all it has needed is a valve cover gasket. It is as strong as the day I drove it off the lot new for her. I told her to change the oil monthly, send me the bills, and when she decides to get an Outback, I'll yank the six and drop it into my '87 Syncro GL, if such a thing is possible.

I'm not interested in going 100 mph with six of my friends in the Van, but I'd like to be able to get up all but the steepest of hills on the highway without downshifting. And it would be nice to not lie awake at night worrying that tomorrow might bring a head gasket leak, intermittent engine cut-out, sticky lifter, high idle...

Chris Wyatt Fairbanks, Alaska

On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Dan Moy wrote:

> For what it is worth, I also thing the legacy engine would make a better > choice. Correct me if I am wrong but did the 6 cylinder come only in the > SVX? If so you will have to consider the avaliability and cost of the > engine and replacement parts. Not to mention, the strain on the drive > train, you will also need a brake system upgrade to stop the > shoe box when you are doing 100+ with 7 people, while pulling the trailer > and the A/C blasting. Also subaru no longer produces the SUX? > > On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Ivan Boyd wrote: > > > How about the six cylinder Subaru? Would it be too much power? > > > > Thanks, > > Ivan > > > > On Wed, 16 Jul 1997, Larry Hamm wrote: > > > > > Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1997 00:41:05 -0500 > > > From: Larry Hamm <ldhamm@xmission.com> > > > To: Multiple recipients of list <vanagon@lenti.med.umn.edu> > > > Subject: Re: Which Subaru engine? > > > > > > Lionel Tun wrote: > > > > > > > Which Subaru engine(s) is(are) a suitable replacement for the 1.9l VW? > > > > > > > > I saw an ad for a Subaru 1800 4WD asking just GB#50 that 50 pounds for > > > > the > > > > engine. Should I buy this as an insurance policy? > > > > > > > > 1984 Caravelle GL auto, 188k miles > > > > > > > > Lionel Tun > > > > ark@saqnet.co.uk > > > > > > Lionel, > > > The 2.2L Legacy engine is a much better candidate- more power, more > > > efficient, more modern. Available in turbo version. > > > Larry > > > > > > > > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.