Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 1997)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 9 Oct 1997 14:00:22 -0700
Reply-To:     mdstockr <mdstockr@NEO.LRUN.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon mailing list <Vanagon@Gerry.SDSC.EDU>
From:         mdstockr <mdstockr@NEO.LRUN.COM>
Subject:      Re: Synthetic Oil(s)
Comments: To: David Bayer <bayer@SYBASE.COM>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

My understanding is that this limitation does apply to synthetics. However, since I am not a CE, my information is second hand. I would check the engine oil bible web site, if it is still up.

My understanding is ...

The benefits of synthetic are: - Improved lubrication - Ability to flow at lower temperatures - More stable base stock - Leaves fewer deposits in engine

The detriments of synthetics are: - Cost - You should not use in an engine with more than 24,000 mi that had previously used conventional oils, unless the engine is flushed first

Synthetics are not high mileage oils, simply because: - Modifiers break down - Contamination builds up (dirt, moisture, etc.) just like in conventional oils

I have been using synthetic lubrication (engine oil, transmission oil, grease) in all of my vehicles for the last 12 years, and I still follow conventional maintenance schedules, including changing the oil/filter every 3 mo/3,000 mi.

--- On Thu, 9 Oct 1997 12:30:52 PDT David Bayer <bayer@SYBASE.COM> wrote:

>>| With a 5w50 oil, the base stock is 5W with modifiers to make it act like its up to 50W >>| at higher temperatures. >>| >>| The problem is, these modifiers break down over time, even in as little as 2,500 mi. >>| Once this happens, you basically have base stock oil, in this case 5w, which is too >>| thin for pre-1990 engines. > > Is this true of a synthentic as well? I know dino oil burns itself >into varnishes over time, but isn't the "benefit of a synethic that people >mix a bunch of polymeres together that are much more stable in the thermal >ranges seen inside an engine? Or even blend the polymers to change viscocity >to correlate with the needs at specific temperatures? Or is this just a >myth of synethics? > >dave

-----------------End of Original Message-----------------

______________________________________________

"Michael Stocker" <mdstockr@neo.lrun.com> 10/9/97 4:46:29 PM EDT ______________________________________________


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.