Chris wrote: >People - I was talking about reliability here - not performance... >there is NO DOUBT that the Automatics hold up better, and last longer than >the Manual transmissions... Yesterday, after my note ranting of my '86 GL performance I ran across a beautiful 91 Carat stick van with 65K miles on the clock. Now I want to talk reliability! Is this true that the auto is more reliable and cheaper to maintain than the stick? Should I run from a van with a trailer hitch on its tail? I'm considering buying this van and selling my wife's showroom condition 93 Audi 100 (Tornado red, 26K miles). I'll then have an 86GL and a 91 Carat... Sounds cool but maybe stupid? Advice please! Eric Small Dallas, TX |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.