>i constantly see postings for increased power via engine swaps. why hasn't >anyone been able to turbo or supercharge their 2.1 wasserboxer? this doesn't >seem to be that hard. or does it? it seems that would be the way to get the >extra horsepower and torque. well? anyone? i'll check the archives too >
I have turbocharged a golf motor in a rabbit pickup. The rabbit/golf block is cast iron, and responds better to turbocharging than an aluminum block, like the waterbox. I know Porsche has made many aluminum turbo motors, but thats Porsche. The fact is, forced induction puts severe heat and mechanical stress on a motor. The waterbox is stressed out enough in stock trim lugging around heavy campers. The sealing surfaces in them tend to be challenged too. I know these motors can last a long time, but that seems to be the exception rather than the rule. Don't mean to offend anyone by hammering the waterboxer, I just don't think its a good idea to turbo one. If you want power, do an engine swap with an Audi 5000 turbo - smooth, reliable, high torque and power. |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.