Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 1998)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 1 Mar 1998 21:40:57 -0500
Reply-To:     Scot Douglas <sdoug@CONCENTRIC.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Scot Douglas <sdoug@CONCENTRIC.NET>
Organization: Mitsubishi Motors R&D of America
Subject:      Re: re; smog sympathies
Comments: To: Larry Carter <lcarter@COWICHAN.COM>
Comments: cc: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Larry Carter wrote: > I realize that not everyone can do what I've done to clean up the > air they breathe, but I don't think my gutted cat is putting any strain on > global ecological picture. Go ahead and snipe away, I won't change my > stance.

I appreciate your view on this issue Larry, but I must insist on saying one thing: Every car must be maintained to the original emission specification it is certified as. Period.

So the air is cleaner. Smog isn't as bad as it used to be. There's a reason for pollution control devices on vehicles; they fucking work. If you could maintain your vehicle as originally equipped, i.e. O2 sensor if equipped, catalytic converter and even the pesky smog pump on the older cars, the CARB and EPA could relax the regulations just a bit.

Instead, we keep striving toward stricter regulations to compensate for the people that think they get a little more power from a gutted cat or those that drive cars that were built before strict regulation. The same people that shitcan their EGR valves, remove fuel injection to go an aftermarket carburetor that makes the vehicle seem to run better by being overly rich.

Do you have any idea what a problem improper vehicle maintenance is? You've heard of OBD II? It's the current vehicle's (96 MY and newer) self diagnostic system that senses when any part of the emission system or related part fails and illuminates a check engine light (MIL). The dealer can then check the code that the ECU stores and replace the defective part. I hear alot of people that disconnect the light and ignore it. The EPA / CARB has decided this little light might not be enough and are considering OBD III; can you say big brother (sic)? The focus of OBD III is to *Alert* the dealership via whatever communications necessary at the time of the MIL illumination. They will then send you a reminder via mail or whatever telling you your car needs service. How long will it be before you can be issued a violation because you've ignored the warnings?

In closing, if every person decided to take the same viewpoint as Larry (and many do, I'm also guilty of a past vehicle), the air quality will, if not continue to deteriorate, recover at a far slower rate.

Besides, how much does a replacement catalytic converter cost?

-- Best Regards, Scot Douglas Project Engineer; Chrysler/Mitsubishi Joint Programs Mitsubishi Motors R&D of America P: (313) 971-0900 x32 F: (313) 971-0901


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.