-----Original Message----- From: Rob MacLeod <macleod@CVRTI.UTAH.EDU> To: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM <Vanagon@VANAGON.COM> Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 22:44 Subject: Re: CRASH WORTHY??
>On Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:56:21 -0700 Bill <Bill@FREEHOLDER.COM> wrote: > >> Consumer Reports, generally, doesn't like SUVs either, not because of >> what happens to them in a wreck, but what happens to the passengers in >> the other car. > >They also dislike some because they tip over too easily. And have hated >others because of the jagged interior of the passenger compartment. > But you also forgot they only like the vehicles there palms get greased over. I have spent over 50,000 miles in a 4 door Sidekick and I have never felt as if it was trying to lean over. The main thing to remember is these services are just like movie critics plain and simple. Take them with a grain of salt 'cause they are just a business trying to make a buck James |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.