Date:         Tue, 28 Apr 1998 01:33:08 -0700
Reply-To:     "John R. Jetty" <jjetty@PAHRUMP.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         "John R. Jetty" <jjetty@PAHRUMP.COM>
Subject:      Re: CRASH WORTHY??
Comments: To: Rob MacLeod <macleod@CVRTI.UTAH.EDU>, Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob MacLeod <macleod@CVRTI.UTAH.EDU>
To: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM <Vanagon@VANAGON.COM>
Date: Monday, April 27, 1998 22:44
Subject: Re: CRASH WORTHY??


>On Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:56:21 -0700 Bill <Bill@FREEHOLDER.COM> wrote:
>
>> Consumer Reports, generally, doesn't like SUVs either, not because of
>> what happens to them in a wreck, but what happens to the passengers in
>> the other car.
>
>They also dislike some because they tip over too easily. And have hated
>others because of the jagged interior of the passenger compartment.
>

But you also forgot they only like the vehicles there palms get greased
over. I have spent over 50,000 miles in a 4 door Sidekick and I have never
felt as if it was trying to lean over.
    The main thing to remember is these services are just like movie critics
plain and simple. Take them with a grain of salt 'cause they are just a
business trying to make a buck

James