Vanagon EuroVan
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (May 1998, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 11 May 1998 10:47:44 -0400
Reply-To:     Erik O <koesel@UAKRON.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Erik O <koesel@UAKRON.EDU>
Subject:      Re: Swap update: Dasher Manifolds
Comments: To: Tom Carrington <tcarrington@RELITECH.COM>,
          "Vanagon@VANAGON.COM" <Vanagon@VANAGON.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Tom Carrington wrote: > > David Marshall wrote: > > > > I am using the Audi Fox dual outlet manifold on my swap. The inline four > > VW engines take very well to free flowing exhausts. I would definatly try > > to get the Audi Fox / Dasher manifold and the down pipe. If you mount the > > dp "backwards" and bend it up slightly it is a perfect fit. The dual > > outlet VW Rabbit manifold should work if you have someone who good at > > bending exhaust pipe. > > When reading this, please keep in mind that David is using a KEP engine > adapter and a custom-made engine mount. With the stock diesel > bellhousing on the tranny, the manifold/exhaust system David mentions > may not clear the driver side engine mount.

I just found this out for myself. I had purchased a Dasher manifold and dual downpipe last fall and when I started to work on it a couple days ago I found there was no way to get that manifold in there without modifying the engine mount. I opted against grinding material off the mount and found a different manifold.

In discussing this exhaust issue with some of my mechanic friends, everyone of them warned against opening up the exhaust too much. They told me that I may get 5 to 10 more horsepower, but that would be at over 5000rpm and my lower end torque would suffer. With this in mind I am opting to use the manifold from a 1.8L Golf. It's the type that requires spring clamps to mount the downpipe on. All I have to work with for the downpipe is the end socket part with a short piece of pipe attached. The pipe that comes out of this socket is approx 1 3/4 in diameter. I will be removing this smaller pipe and using a 2" pipe I purchased from Summit Racing and manufactured by Hooker Headers. It's a mandrel bent pipe with a 180 deg bend with 6" and 15" legs, very high quality. I'll be cutting it somewhere around 110 degrees in the bend to put the pipe past the drivers side engine mount. From there is will turn to the rear at 90 deg and then it will be in the "stock" position. I figure the 2" pipes will provide great flow past the manifold and the Golf manifold will give me some needed back pressure. If I need to open the manifold up more, I can always grind it out a bit.

Anyone have any opinions on this?

_______________________ Erik O Akron, Oh 82 GTI Westfalia http://ebyte.com/gl http://ebyte.com/wow


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.