Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 1998, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 19 May 1998 12:59:51 -0400
Reply-To:     Erik O <koesel@UAKRON.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Erik O <koesel@UAKRON.EDU>
Subject:      Inline Exhaust Theory: part II
Comments: To: "Vanagon@VANAGON.COM" <Vanagon@VANAGON.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Just to sum up my decision on using the "dreaded stock manifold". During my search for the ultimate exhaust system for my van, I heard a lot of suggestions from people I would consider to be experts on VW's and general automotive theory. Most all of these people agree that engines need some amount of back pressure and back pressure and low end torque go hand in hand. If you assume the internal volume of the Golf manifold is X, then alot of these "trick" headers could be assumed to have a volume of 2X. At least double. While this may work out well for a small passenger car, my big Westfalia might be better off with the Golf manifold. VW engineers weren't off by that much in the design of the "dreaded manifold". Plus considering how thick the sidewalls of the manifold are, I can always bore it out a couple mils to decrease back pressure a bit. The experts also agree that a good pipe flow is helpful for performance, which I've accomplished and I'll explain later. Finally, one last note on backpressure, flow, exhaust manifolds, and trick headers. All of the experts agreed that the number one way to get more power from an engine is DISPLACEMENT. Trick headers, MSD ignition, K&N filters all might help a little if the stock parts they're replacing are inadequate, but for true performance gains, displacement is the key. So unless I'm going to bore out my engine, I'm not missing out on too much with my exhaust.

Alright, now I have this donut outlet manifold to finish up with the rest of the exhaust system. The Golf manifold I'm using isn't like most I have seen. The outlet does not come out in the center like most I've seen. It comes out straight, but closer to the left. The hole faces perpendicular to the driveline, just closer to the port on the left, if not right in line with the left center port. This clears the mount easily. I picked up the round half from a downpipe at a boneyard. This is the piece that accepts the other half of the spring clamps. The rest of the pipe I'm using is 2" ID and for all the bends I'm using header pipe made by Hooker Headers and purchased locally at Summit Racing in Akron, Oh. These are beautifully made mandrel bent pipes. I purchased two of these, 180 deg mandrel bent with 3" radius and 6" and 15" legs. The first one I cut for the downpipe at around 120 degrees in the bend to fit in the 2" hole I drilled in the downpipe bracket from the junkyard. This was then welded together by a pro welder, definitely not me. This left me with the pipe close to the driverside rear wheel (not too close) perpendicular to the driveline. From here I cut the other header pipe in half at 90 deg in the bend to leave me with two 90 deg elbows. Connecting these with a little cutting and "temporary" u-bolts and I have a 2" pipe facing the passenger side of the van behind the engine. This is the "stock" position. Then a 30" length of 2" straight pipe and a "turbo" high flow muffler finishes the job. Also, good exhaust hangers all around to support everything. (All that was hard to describe, you might have to wait for the pics. Sorry.)

Everything's together and tight. All supported by exhaust hangers bolted through existing holes in the frame. Time to fire up. VROOOM! WOW IS THIS THING LOUD!. Actually, it wasn't that bad, just a little too much for my tastes. Drove it around for awhile, great power and performance. Just a little too LOUD!. Back to Summit Racing for an additional muffler. Didn't want to screw up the flow too much and as a joke I bought a glass pack to install in place of the 30" straight pipe along the rear. Much better after that.

That's all for now. When I get the pics down I'll have a better description on my site. I just hope that I find this all to be worth it. I could have just used a stock diesel manifold. I know a guy that's put 80k on his van running the stock manifold. He drives to most of the east coast shows and tows an enclosed 4x8 trailer, doing 70 all the way. Still has tons of power and gets good mileage all the way. Which was actually one of the other reasons I used the golf manifold. It flows much better than stock, and stock still works good. Later.

_______________________ Erik O Akron, Oh 82 GTI Westfalia http://ebyte.com/gl http://ebyte.com/wow


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.