Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (May 1998, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 20 May 1998 19:47:47 -0700
Reply-To:     David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Subject:      Re: New motor selections for vanagons.
Comments: To: Sam Scholten <vwvanagon@YAHOO.COM>, Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
In-Reply-To:  <19980518224922.1616.rocketmail@send1a.yahoomail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

My inline 4 swap is working great! I just drove 1400km and the ONLY problem was a leak from a old and cracked coolant hose... not the engines fault, just the cheap owners fault ;)

The only thing I have to add is if you are going to do a V4 I4 swap DO NOT use us a 1.6L as I did. There is not enough power to keep a constant 100km/h going. At times on long 18% greades 2nd gear is needed and I am at a crawling speed of 60km/h @ 4000 rpm. Driving with the pedal to the metal I go 22mpg. Again this will improve with a bigger motor as it will not have to work as hard.

Once the wasserboxes sells I will be installing a 2.0L block and I will have more power than the original 2.1L wasserboxer.

At 15:49 5/18/98 -0700, Sam Scholten wrote: >Volks, > >Pragmatism has to prevail here. Essentially, with a loooooow budget >like me, should my WB blow up tomorrow, I will be forced to look at >several swap options. With all the choices, I have to look at price, >power, efficiency, reliability, and FEASABILITY of the swap. >Therefore, I have to go with a known quantity. (That's why I'm >following Patrick Dooley's 2.3 swap closely). In other words, I will >feel comfortable with a swap after a particular engine has proven >itself. IF ANYBODY HAS HAD SOME MEASURE OF SUCCESS WITH YOUR SWAP, >PLEASE SPEAK NOW!!!!!! Many listees will be forever indebted to you. > >Helmut, how's your Audi 5cyl doing? :) > >Best of luck on your swaps, >Sam > > > > >---Modl6971 <Modl6971@AOL.COM> wrote: >> >> There's a lot of talk of the Subaru engine kits, Buick V6 and the >Porsche >> motors. With patetiance, us vanagon owners will soon be able stick >in three >> new awsome motors. My first choice would be the new 1.9 liter TDI, >with a >> wopping 115 HP and around 160 of torque, second, the new VR5 >(narrow 15 >> degree 5 cylinder) around 160 HP, and the 1.8 turbo (currently used >on the new >> Passats and Audi's) 150 HP. Soon there will be a recked one that >will find its >> way into a vanagon, hopefully mine. Michael M. 87 syncro. >> > >_________________________________________________________ >DO YOU YAHOO!? >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > >

-- David Marshall, Quesnel BC, mailto:david@volkswagen.org -- -- 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy, 87 Audi 5KQ -- -- 85 1.8L VW Cabrio, 88 1.6L VW Syncro Double Cab -- -- Volkswagen Homepage http://www.volkswagen.org -- -- USE DAVID@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG WHEN SENDING EMAIL --


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.