At 12:05 PM 6/18/98 -0700, you wrote: >Fred, I really appreciate your feedback and knowledge re my suspension musings. I >wanted to ask you a couple of things re your earlier reply...but I am struggling to >get a brief out the door. I have not seen the post from Fred, but Fred is likely right about this. >Why does pre-loading the spring not change the "spring rate." I think it >does....it is a minor adjustment of spring-rate, isn't it. By compressing the >spring, you increase it's rate over the entire course of it's remaining travel, Those doughnuts do not compress the spring! >don't you? This is like putting a stiffer spring on, but the change is not as much >as you would find between two consecutively rated springs. > >Inserting a spacer does not implicate the cv's the way larger wheels would. It's >the same as using a stiffer spring, that's all. The actual geometry of the >suspension does not change....i.e., you are not increasing travel or changing the >axle angle beyond what normally occurs within the stock range of travel. Wrong, I believe. I believe the spacers raise the body of the vehicle in relation to the control arms (and thus the body in relation to the ground; this would cause the CVs to exit their houses at a different angle than they otherwise would.) >I agree with your comments re realistic expectastions and defining use. I do not >do radical 4 wheeling. I know I must strike a compromise between pavement use and >off-road use. Still, within that context, the suspension can be fine tuned to I believe we all need to be as radical as we can. (sorry, just joking.) >perform better. I just want a little more firmness without sacraficing damping >responsiveness, and I want the spring rates balanced front to rear and left to >right (the westy list to the left). I should be able to accomplish this by >adjusting the spring pre-load at all 4 wheels using spacers. As the suspension is >stock, it is out of balance front-to-back and left-to-right, and it's too soft. I >think accomplishing this limited goal will be a big improvement and it is all I am >seeking to do. Based on extensive tests I have done, the syncro tends to be much heavier in the left rear than the other three corners. So something to adjust for that is logical. But extra shims in the left rear corner would likely alter ride height in that corner, not really spring rate in that corner.
_____________________________________________________ Derek Drew New York, NY & Washington DC ConsumerSearch drew@interport.net 212-580-6486 (W) 212-580-4459; 202-966-0938 (H) |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.