> If it can be done to a motorcycle, why not to each wheel on a car? Truth is > that it is in some applications...no reason why it can't be done here. > Pre-load is no different than inserting a stiffer spring...it is stiffer > throughout the range of travel. ***you obviously don't understand springs or are using 'stiffer' the wrong way. Preload only increases the force the spring pushes back by a constant amount through the range of travel. If the spring has no preload and the mechanism the spring is in is extended all the way--your motorcycle with no one sitting on it and no turns on the adjuster knob, or the rear of the van jacked up, wheels off the ground--the spring is neutral, exerting no push or is extended all the way. Inserting spacers or adding turns on the adjuster knob only means that when the mechanism the spring is a part of is extended all the way, the spring will still be compressed some and exerting 'push' forces. Conversely, if you stretched the spring (elastically) and extended the mechanism the spring would be exertind 'pull' force. The stiffness of a spring is a physical characteristic of the spring that you won't change by stretching or compressing the spring within its elastic range of use (all else being equal). Now if you stretch the spring to the point where you actually bend the coils, i think that would make the spring 'stiffer'. Take apart your ball point pen and play with that spring a bit. Don't confuse the amount of force you get from the spring at various points through its travel and stiffness...they are two TOTALLY different things. And don't do rediculous thought experiments like inserting 12 inches of spacers cause that isn't a realistic application--you'd bend something. > > If Harold's spring's are not stiffer, why does it handle better in turns and > not roll so much anymore. Sag adjustment is supposed to do exactly what > Harry did. Because you're just preloading the spring and it will take more force to get the same initial compression and overcome the preload. youwill still get the same amount of spring compression for a given force however. > > Anyway...seems like this will never be resolved through debate....I already > pissed derek off and probably others, too. ***Right, cause i think some fundamental understanding of springs is not present. > > I know from 25 years of tuning suspension on bikes that I am right. That's > good enough for me. :~) That's like saying that my 13 years of driving with a clean record means i know the motor vehicle laws. Not really, it just means i haven't got caught. I think your 25 years of experience has given you a well tuned tush, but i don't think it necessarily means you understand springs in interms of the spring response, stiffness and preload (math/engineering). You know how to adjust things to get the ride you like. But isn't the tush factor what's important as long as you aren't compromising safety or reliability? i really think that from the content in the thread at least Larry and Steve would benefit by getting a book from the library about springs, not a web site from yamaha or whatever, but something about springs that explains forces, stiffness (spring constants), preload, and spring response. Just statics will do. You guys throw around preload, stiffness, travel and force interchangeably in your thot experiments and they aren't interchangeable--they are unique quantities with their own definitions. later, fred
> steve > > Fred Porter wrote: > > > That does it! Can't you guys (Larry and Steve) see that what Larry says > > below totally supports the non-preload contingent of the list (which is > > almost everyone except larry and steve). By tightening the knurled > > spring adjuster up a little (see Larry's caveat of _with nobody on the > > bike_ ie. suspension is topped out and the spring is constrained) you > > effectively insert a spacer. Then when you sit on the bike, loading it, > > the sag is less and the rider rides a bit higher. There are two very > > different conditions being mixed up here: loaded with sag and > > unloaded/topped out. > > The preload is increased ON THE BIKE when unlaoded and topped out and > > you tighten the adjuster. Once you load the system (van or bike) you > > are changing the ride height. > > Preload is only effected when you have a constrained spring in the case > > of the UNLOADED and TOPPED out suspension. > > > > > Motorbike tension adjusters are similar in their effect. > > > With nobody sitting on the bike, the spring might be extended all the > > > way, limit of travel. (On a vanagon that almost never happens) > > > Now you tighten the adjuster and you compress the spring, but not > > > raising the height of the bike, but just increasing the tension on the > > > spring. (with nobody on the bike) > > > Once you get back on, the bike will of course sag less, since the > > > springs are now more stiff. ????? > > > > the spring is NOT more stiff, you've just raised the position of the > > lower perch. > > > > > Does this mean a vanagon is like a motorbike with someone big > > > sitting on it ???? imho > > > > if you put someone big on your bike it would sag more for the same > > spring adjuster setting. > > > > so the westy isn't leaning, that was fixed that by increasing the ride > > height of that side by raising it with a spacer at one end of the spring > > not by making the spring any stiffer. I wouldn't go sticking any > > spacers inbetween the coils as that will limit your useable travel. > > Spacers inbetween the coils will make the spring stiffer and if you use > > Larry's method of thinking about unreasonable extremes then with spacers > > inbetween each coil it will no longer be acting like a spring, but like > > a solid rod REALLY stiff--no suspension at all. You guys could do > > that--just remove all the suspension components and put screw jacks in > > there and load level all day long :) > > > > later, > > fred |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.