Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 08:45:10 -0700
Reply-To: Ray Hunnam <hunnam@PNC.COM.AU>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From: Ray Hunnam <hunnam@PNC.COM.AU>
Organization: RAYJEN Security
Subject: Re: 5 speed? they do exist (in Europe...)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Meier
Have to agree with you on one point.
I have a 91 Van fitted with the MV series motor rated at 95BHP coupled to a 5 speed tranny. Came to the dealer that way, may have been a preferred option by the PO when he ordered it.
The motor uses the Digifant EFI. and is rated below the 112 BHP version DJ engine which was minus the Catalytic Converter. I could be wrong but I thought this higher bhp engine used carb's rather that fuel injection.
The five speed tranny is a joy to drive, except for the position of first. It is an extended H pattern with first being stuck out on its own below reverse. The change from first to second requires a shift up and across the gate and up
again into second. You are correct by the time you complete the shift the vehicle behind is right up your " last part over the fence " but being the big beautiful rear it is they get the message and hang back at the next lights.
Apart from this the Vanagon is a delight to drive on the open road. The box itself seems well geared for Australian conditions with fifth being an overdrive gear and made for highways. We do not have the extremely high mountains that are in
Europe or the Americas. Our highest mountain is only just over 7000 feet high. I live just outside Sydney and we have a mountain range at our back door called the Blue Mountains which are just over 3000 feet. I go up there often and my
Van with the five speed handles it in fourth no problem. I guess our gradients are not as steep.
I would have thought that the five speed would have been standard in the US seeing they have the Intestates. I remember driving on them myself in a Camper Van (ok flame me it was not a westie) and thought then vehicle could sure use an
overdrive fifth gear.
Sorry for the length but apart from the bad first gear position the five speed is a joy.
Ray Hunnam
Meier Michael wrote:
> >any ideas as to why the 5speed wasn't offered in the US???
>
> Chris,
> I think because they are terrible to drive. When you start in 1st it takes enormous long time to bring the damned stick in 2nd position. Normally you've lost all your speed then. (Maybe I'm looking through the pink automatic-glasses....)
> It's unusual to have the first gear in that position and I think VW didn't want to risk problems with the normal user. The other thing is that US only got the stronger
> engines (90 hp, 92/95 hp) and not the popular weak 60 / 70 / 78 hp units we mainly had in europe. This takes the need for more gears.
>
> Best wishes
> Michael Meier
> Germany
>
> 58 split
> 77 westy
> 90 caravelle auto