Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1998, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 15 Jul 1998 22:31:43 CDT
Reply-To:     Joel Walker <JWALKER@UA1VM.UA.EDU>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Joel Walker <JWALKER@UA1VM.UA.EDU>
Subject:      Re: VW's have feelings?
Comments: To: Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
In-Reply-To:  <35AD615E.4665@cyburban.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 15 Jul 1998 22:11:42 -0400 DavidM said: >Robert A. Alexander wrote: >> Hope to never have to make a long distance trip in a VW with your >> attitude. >> >You REALLY think an inanimate object can sense how you feel... give me a >break!

ah, the gauntlet has been flopped at our feet!!! :)

what is the difference between an inanimate object "having feelings" and a human projecting feelings onto an inanimate object??

or for that matter, does an animal, such as a dog or cat, have "feelings"? most dog owners will tell you that, yes, THEIR dog has feelings. THEIR dog knows when he/she has been naughty or is being scolded or praised. etc. but you and i both know of dogs and cats that have to be complete and utter morons, totally without feelings or any hint of intelligence. like some of my coworkers. :)

hmmm. well, ok, dogs have brains. brains have electrical impulses bumping around inside ... sort of like our brains. so at least it MIGHT be possible that a dog has "feelings". a dog therefore could be "jealous" of attention paid to a child, cat, or other dog. a dog therefore could be "hurt" if you neglect to play with it.

but a machine? ahhhh, but is it JUST a machine?? what about all the people who dug up the iron ore and the other people who melted that ore and made the steel that was made into the beams, sheets, screws, and bolts that went into the doors, body, frame, wheels, and other parts of the car? didn't those people, all along the assembly process, have "feelings" and some sort of "personality"?? and is it possible perhaps that those feelings and personalities might not be somehow "etched" into the metal, fabric, wires, and glass of the car itself? such that the car, when finished, is a product of all the personalities that built it ... which is why perhaps a Monday or Friday car is not as good as a Wednesday car: the people building it didn't feel good while building it.

oh, sure, it's easy to say that Monday and Friday cars are crappier because the people didn't try as hard on those days. they made more mistakes. but with modern assembly lines, is that all that can make that sort of difference? or is it, for example, why the cars produced on lines with more robots have less "personality" ... because there were fewer people building them. the Vanagons seem to have, according to the bus consensus, LESS "personality" than the split-window buses. the splits were all hand welded and hand-built. the Vanagons had many many robot-welds, robot painted, and assembies that were done completely by robot. and the Eurovan probably even more.

people do tend to project personalities or persona onto inanimate objects, sometimes those persona are similar to the person doing the projecting. sometimes completely different. perhaps a way of letting out a subconscious split-personality? and some people simply do not get along with machines .. any sort of machine. projection again? self-destructive types of projection? it is true that men tend to project male "personalities" on their machines, and women tend to project female "personalities" on theirs. but not always. yet, some buses have a "personality" that jumps out at their owners, and other buses, owned by the same people, don't. if it's projected by the owner, why not?

at any rate, it is true, in my limited experience, and in the writings of others on the same subject, that machines fare better in the company of people who do believe that perhaps, just perhaps, the machine does have a sort of "personality". obviously, a person who believes this, even for a tiny bit, will take better care of his/her "machine" ... just as they would take better care of a dog or cat (than someone who thinks dogs or cats are just "animals" and not "part of the family"). i don't think it matters if the machine or the person is the one with the personality ... what matters is the treatment of the machine. and without a leeeeeeeetle bit of that belief, the machine suffers. and when the machine suffers, the person will suffer.

unca joel. :)

who used to work with a computer that hated a couple of the other workers. if i walked out of the room, when one of the two people were present, the machine would crash. as long as i stayed in the room, it would run fine. if they got there before me, it would not start up. when i came in, it worked just fine. the engineers could never find anything wrong with it. Coincidence? :) You Be The Judge. ;)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.