Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1998, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 28 Jul 1998 17:30:40 -0700
Reply-To:     David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Subject:      Re: Eurospec Conversion
Comments: To: PATT <pdooley@GTE.NET>, Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
In-Reply-To:  <01bdba82$e2bd1800$48b92599@pat>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 19:53 7/28/98 -0400, PATT wrote: >> >> I, for one, am interested in knowing what's so wonderful about a >2.0L >> Golf gas in-line engine conversion. >> >> Does it have MORE torque? >> A wider powerband? >> Better gas mileage? >> Better thermal efficiency? > >Better thermal efficiency? You mean better gas milage? It's a high >compression golf motor, so should be quite a bit more "thermally" efficient >as higher CR motors are more efficient. You can also beat the hell out it >and still expect to see 200k miles from it. Did I mention it's a golf >motor? You know, the engine VW was supposed to use in the first place? It >took somebody this long to build a kit? Any reason all the vanagons being >built overseas are using motor or derivatives? >Because its the best choice. > >> Lower cost? >In the long run. > >> Does it work with an automatic transmission? >KEP makes an adapter for auto trans, I believe a test vehicle was equipped >with auto. > >> Does it require mods to the engine compartment lid? >Don't think so. Motor is 2.0 non-crossflow, so no intake interference.

The cross flow is one of the tallest VW engines produced. The block is 16.5mm taller than the 1.8s and 1.6s plus the cross flow head adds even more to it.

It will be interesting to see what they offer for the deck height solution...

>> Anyone who has read the European Car magazine article willing >> to post the Good/Bad/Ugly details? > >As usual, EC didn't post any details. From the photos, looks like KEP >adapter plate and flywheel are used. I can scan pics from mag if anyone >interested. Is that legal?

If this is all they are using then the kit is quite simple to produce. I was thinking of this myself and may still produce a limited run of my engine mounts. My solution works very well. I always thought the big problem with the KEP kit is that it is not a complete solution.

-- David Marshall, Quesnel BC, mailto:david@volkswagen.org -- -- 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy, 87 Audi 5KQ -- -- 85 1.8L VW Cabrio, 88 1.6L VW Syncro Double Cab -- -- Volkswagen Homepage http://www.volkswagen.org -- -- USE DAVID@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG WHEN SENDING PMAIL --


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.