Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1998, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 29 Jul 1998 14:50:03 EDT
Reply-To:     FrankGRUN@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Frank Grunthaner <FrankGRUN@AOL.COM>
Subject:      Re: Eurospec Conversion: Digifant Comment
Comments: To: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

I've been following these exchanges on engine conversion questions for many years. As a consequence, I converted my '82 Diesel Westfalia to gasoline power after considerable research and many helpful inputs from list members such as Alstair Bell. The conversion began in September of '95, went on the road in Jan. '96, and is nearly finished (got the Air Conditioner up this weekend, only the subwoofer remains). I used an 8V 1.8L DIGIFANT engine from a '90 GTI donor with malice a forethought! I also used a K&N air filter system, fabricated an air introduction system interfaced to the original diesel inlet system in the driver's side rear compartment, added a adjustable cam gear for 4 degree retard on valve timing to shift the torque max to lower rpm, added a dual downdraft exhaust manifold from a GLI, made a dual pipe exhaust system to catalyst to dual port muffler, modified the alternator to build in the rear segment from a Porsche 944 and routed fresh air to the rear of the alternator pickup. I also use a dual battery setup in the right rear location, added air conditioning using the GTI AC compressor with additional evaporator, condensor air handling components from an '85 Westfalia, and kept the diesel trans.

My point is that the digifant engine has been superb. It installed quite easily compared to the CIS routing nightmare. It has proved extremely reliable, highly efficient (I range from 18 to 22 mpg). The van pulls beautifully from 2000 RPM and redlines (6500) in any gear (1st through 4th). I readily pull the 2 freeway between the 134 and the 210 (Southern California coordinates) with a full camper load (wife, me, 10 year old daughter, two dogs, Westy tent, provisions, hot shower system, etc) at 70 mph, and the calibrated temp gauge holds just below the LED. Under these conditions, the engine manifold vacuum is 6 inches. On the open freeway, 65 mph cruise corresponds to 12 inches, and this drops to 10 for 75. Max speed I have had it up to on the the interstate is 95 and I am not at full throttle. BTW, the weight of the Westfalia also includes my supplemental gas tank which gives me a net 26.8 gallon fual capacity. This level of performance is more than adequate and stresses the capability of the chassis. I have not yet finished horsepower tests (road g-meter) nor acceleration times, but other measurements are consistant with 105 to 110 hp from this RV engine. The added power possibilities from the CIS system, from my experience are expensive, and more relevant to other watercooled VW applications. Finally the knock sensor/ EFI Digifant system does a remarkable job of maximizing timing advance over a wide range on temperatures and pressures (read mountain elevations). Clean contacts, and a careful study of the wiring diagram together with a copy of the Golf/Jetta/GTI Bentley (a real workshop manual as compared to the joke of a vanagon edition) and replacement of simple sensors will handle any problem I've encountered.

Second point, all these discussions about changing the diesel trans to lower engine rpm. Nonesense. The dynamic range of the engine is well matched to the weight of the vehicle --- its a 1.8 liter engine! Torque to the road is certainly related to engine displacement, and gearing. Gearing is a good substitute for displacement. I did go to 27/8.50x14 BFG tires to reduce rpm and correct speedo (less than 0.2% error in my measurements) and odometer. The current engine speed at 70 mph in the vanagon is similar to daily cruising throughout Germany on the Autobahn in any rental Golf, Polo, Opel or Ford (by my rental experience) and these engines return in excess of 200,000 km lifetimes before head work or overhaul. In my application/installation, I monitor oil temperature, oil pressure, voltage (both batteries), current, manifold vacuum, coolant temperature and exhaust manifold temperature. At 75 mph, on southern california freeways, full load and 90 F outside temperatures, my engine oil temperature ranges from 245 F to 250 F. Highest temperature I have seen with this setup was 262 F (using Mobil 1 synthetic 15W-50) going up the Grapevine at a steady 60 mph.

So, in my experience, the 1.8 L/ 8V Digifant engine with diesel trans is an outstanding package.. reliable, strong, efficient and fun. I remain bewildered as to why VW didnt standardize on this configuration. Sorry for the length but I had to finally get this comment out.

Of course, the 2.0 liter engine would be even better, and the Digifant/ nee Motronic system is just fine. I anticipate that the Eurospec conversion will be a screamer. More power to Kyle for putting it together.

Frank Grunthaner


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.