Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1998, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 10 Sep 1998 14:17:14 -0400
Reply-To:     mike and becky <mayfly95@PAONLINE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         mike and becky <mayfly95@PAONLINE.COM>
Subject:      Re: auto vs. manual
Comments: To: Darrell Boehler <midwesty@TAOS.MIDWEST.NET>
Comments: cc: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Darrell,

How difficult was the 3rd and 4th sychro hub to replace? Any "special" tools required? Would you be willing to post your procedure for us?

Thanx

Mike 87 Wolf W/E (with whining tranny)

Darrell Boehler wrote:

> ------------------- > Hi Volks, > I kind of like the way the 091/1 transaxle is designed. It has some > improvements over the 091 or 002 that used to be a pita. The shift rods are > nice and long and are held on both ends so shifts are still firm and sure > even after 200k miles. If you do your own transaxle work they are much > easier to adjust and work on. No special jigs needed to adjust shift forks. > From the list I notice some are prone to the breaking syncro hubs. I > have never experienced this. Mine had a worn pinion gear recently that > caused a pretty good whine (had to crank the cd pretty good to hear Jerry). > My 86 westy has 244k miles and I was impressed with how well the bearings > and other gears have held up. I did replace the 3rd / 4th gear syncro hub, > R and P , along with most bearings and I am back on the road again. > Darrell > -----Original Message----- > From: JordanVw@AOL.COM <JordanVw@AOL.COM> > To: Vanagon@VANAGON.COM <Vanagon@VANAGON.COM> > Date: Thursday, September 10, 1998 9:30 AM > Subject: Re: auto vs. manual > > >In a message dated 98-09-10 09:35:29 EDT, mgajewski@MANVILLERUBBER.COM > writes: > > > ><< Also, I always thought manual tranny's were much simpler and therefore > > less trouble prone. I mean, no funky valve plates and little balls > > moving around and all that junk. Auto's are more reliable? I still find > > that hard to believe...what gives? > > Mark > > >> > > > > > >the watercooled Vanagon manual transmissions are a poor design, and have a > >tendency to develop a crack between 3rd and 4th gear on the "slider > >hub"...anyway, this usually leads to problems with 3rd gear, and the only > way > >to fix is to rebuild or replace ($$) > > > >the watercooled Vanagon automatics are based on the early rabbit/jetta > >transmission and have no more problems than any other auto trans out on the > >market. > > > >lack of performance man. vs auto. is very minimal. ive driven both. > > > >odds are, if you own a 4spd Vanagon, you will experience transmission > failure, > >long before someone with a automatic Vanagon does. > > > >i would stick with an automatic, if you want reliability. > > > >chris > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.