Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1998, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 21 Sep 1998 15:44:10 -0400
Reply-To:     James Wagner <wagner01@EROLS.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         James Wagner <wagner01@EROLS.COM>
Subject:      Re: DRL's and daytime
Comments: To: Kelly Bauman <bauman@ICAN.NET>, Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

>At 13:00 18-09-98 -0400, James Wagner wrote: >>What about the color a car has been painted? Before making expensive and >>energy wasting attempts to solve the problem of low visibility........ > >The claims in this debate are getting very humourous. How much do you >figure this technology costs? DRLs use existing ignition and headlight >switches, existing headlights and existing wiring. I don't know the >particulars but I am guessing there is an extra component or two of extra >electrical hardware that makes an ordinary vehicle into a DRL vehicle. >When applied to every vehicle produced, how much do you figure this adds to >the cost? I would bet we are talking a dollar or two. The outrageous >expense argument is right up there with the glare argument and the "until >everyone drives perfectly..." argument in being utterly ridiculous. As for >painting all cars white, I am just going to leave this one alone.:-)

How is this humorous. Color is the least expensive, most-practical solution to the problems of visibility. There is no additional cost to use different colors. The facilities already exist to implement this. If this solution somehow seems humorous, then the whole problem is humorous. It's like complaining that you can't hear someone talking a mile away. It's simply a human limit and is not a problem unless the limit is not recognized.

If you really want to compare costs, try looking a bit closer at how much research and design goes into every part of an automobile. I worked on a project with Ford where they wanted to eliminate a spring that costs less than a dollar. Quite a bit of man power and research time went into trying to do so. And then add the effect on neighborhoods. Light Pollution is certainly a reality. I live on a fairly busy street where my room gets illuminated by passing traffic, high beams or not. Mandating DRL's is going to create many new problems and will not necessarily make anything better.

James Wagner


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.