Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 1998, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 24 Sep 1998 18:18:56 -0700
Reply-To:     David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Subject:      Re: Engine Conversion's Done (long)
Comments: To: Michael Sullivan <sullivan@OPENMARKET.COM>, Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
In-Reply-To:  <3.0.32.19980924102605.00b5e190@po-2.openmarket.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On my site there is a table that shows most of the engines that VW has built. But to anser your question.

2.1L Wasserboxer = 90hp @ 5500 RPM - 117gt/lb @ 3200 RPM 2.0L inline four = 115hp @ 5200 RPM - 135ft/lb @ 2600 RPM

The stats for the Audi 2.0L are a little misleading as it is quite chocked by the exhaust system with a simple exhaust like I am running it will bring the system to or slightly better than the VW 2.0L found in the 93+ Golf and Jetta.

At 10:33 9/24/98 -0400, Michael Sullivan wrote: >Dear David (and Kyle too for that matter), > >Could you elaborate? How much different in HP/Torque are the Wasserboxer >vs. the 2.0L? Do HP/Torque curves exist for comparison? I would be willing >to create such a comparison graph and post it to the web if I could get my >hands on the data. > >Cheers, >MJS > > >At 05:57 PM 9/23/98 -0700, David Marshall wrote: >>At 00:06 9/23/98 EDT, KENWILFY@AOL.COM wrote: >>>4. In-line 4 gas conversion >>>Pros: Good fuel mileage, very reliable power plant, very available motor, >>>parts are cheap and easy to pick up, VW powerplant again makes servicing >>not a >>>problem at the dealer, who is very familiar with this motor. Horsepower is >>>same or more than waterboxer (depending on which motor you choose- 1.6l, >>1.8l, >>>2.0l). This conversion can be done using a diesel Vanagon and has been done >>>more than any other conversion. It has proven to be a good and reliable >>>choice. >>>Cons: Not as much power as some of the other conversions (Chevy or Subaru), >>>not as much low end torque as a normal Waterboxer. >> >>The 2.0L has more power and more torque than the wasserleaker and it comes >>on lower in the RPM range too. Another pro is modifications are cheap and >>plentiful too... >> >> >>-- David Marshall Quesnel BC Canada mailto:david@volkswagen.org -- >>-- 73 Audi 100LS, 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy -- >>-- 87 Audi 5KQ, 85 1.8L VW Cabrio, 88 2.0L VW Syncro Double Cab -- >>-- Volkswagen Homepage http://www.volkswagen.org -- >> >Michael J. Sullivan >Director of Catalog Design >Open Market, Inc. > >************************************* > work: http://www.openmarket.com > play: http://www.hsdesign.com >************************************* >

-- David Marshall Quesnel BC Canada mailto:david@volkswagen.org -- -- 73 Audi 100LS, 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy -- -- 87 Audi 5KQ, 85 1.8L VW Cabrio, 88 2.0L VW Syncro Double Cab -- -- Volkswagen Homepage http://www.volkswagen.org --


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.