Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (October 1998, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Mon, 12 Oct 1998 19:42:33 -0500
Reply-To:     Joshua Van Tol <jjvantol@USWEST.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <Vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Joshua Van Tol <jjvantol@USWEST.NET>
Subject:      Re: Fast German Auto rebuilds and core charges?
Comments: To: John Anderson <janderson@IOLINC.NET>, Vanagon@VANAGON.COM
In-Reply-To:  <008a01bdf4cb$80f7bde0$828166ce@default>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 10:59 PM -0500 10/10/98, John Anderson wrote: >I'm just going to note. Stephens will give it to you hard on the core >charges as well, with the prices FGA lists perhaps even considering the core >charge they aren't so bad. And I've found Stephens and AVP "quality" to be >somewhere between questionable and laughable. AVP is quite liberal and will >give you your core money for near anything, which makes you wonder about >their parts, made me wonder why a seat collapsed from day 1 and lasted about >5000 miles on a 2000cc rebuild. Stephens screws you for the core and >delivers ill machined or incompletely machined junk (waterboxer head >experience.) So all things considered, somebody should try these guys out >and give a definative answer. The air cooled charges aren't so bad after >all, wasserboxers are a bit hefty. Some may say I've been unlucky with >vendors, I say I've just been a bit more descriminating than the average 16 >year old kid. We've heard about the core policy from FGA but no real pans >on quality I recall in the last 4-5 years so who knows?

I second you on the pan of Stephens. I too have had a bad wbx head experience. Two rebuilt 1.9 l heads. One had a crack near one of the studs (not discovered until after it was installed) and both had weld material that needed to be filed back from the stud holes.

The first replacement for the leaky head had cracks between the valve seats that had been peened. BAD BAD! I insisted on a different head. MSHP insisted they'd never peen cracks, but the cracks were ok. Bull. I might reuse a head with cracks between the valve seats (Bently says it's ok) in a pinch, but I'd never accept a "rebuilt" head with cracks. The third head is ok, but they've decided (wrong headedly) to apply a graphite coating, which, if I'm not mistaken, will actually increase corrosion, not decrease it as they claim. Anyway, I'll never buy from them again. Besides that, they still owe me money...

Joshua Van Tol -- jjvantol@lear.csp.ee.memphis.edu


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.