Date:         Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:22:48 -0400
Reply-To:     "Robert A. Alexander" <satcong@VOL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         "Robert A. Alexander" <satcong@VOL.COM>
Subject:      WANKELS & "LATENT" IMPLICATIONS
Comments: To: Bulley-Hewlett & Associates <gmbulley@BULLEY-HEWLETT.COM>
Comments: cc: vanagon@VANAGON.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Matthew - Old habits die hard.  I try not to use my engine to slow my
Vanagon down.  Maybe I generated the image of disengaging the clutch
while going down-hill.  Sorry.  I think this started with someone's
comment about the Wankel probably not providing much "braking" ability,
then a comment about the Smokies which made it sound as though we put
our lives in danger there.  That "I have never found a mountain road..."
is a statement, needing no assumption of implications on your part.  It
was, in context, pertaining to this area of the country.  Actually, with
the clutch engaged, I don't remember seeing over 4Krpm in fourth.

I enjoy watching other folks try to burn rubber & chirp 'em going into
2nd in VW vans.  You say it is "debatable" whether or not using the
engine as a substitute for brakes damages it but you consider that
comment to have a "latent implication"?  From fear of my Vanagon's
"karma", I never speak ill of my van in front of it, never yell at or
kick it.  I also use distilled water in the cooling system and change
the oil & filter because my van told me it's soothing to her.  Have no
idea if it's necessary, just an old habit.

I also say "excuse me" when I belch & laugh when I fart.  But that is
for another day to discuss the implications involved.

BOB - WA4RRN
'85GL
http://www.impeachment.org