Date:         Mon, 19 Oct 1998 23:25:37 -0400
Reply-To:     mike and becky <mayfly95@PAONLINE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         mike and becky <mayfly95@PAONLINE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Vanagon and Spellcheckers(& porn...)
Comments: To: MAJurik27@AOL.COM
Comments: cc: vanagon@VANAGON.COM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

That would be the shit, how do we send archived DRL emails to spammers? Hmmmm...

Michael Jurik wrote:

> In a message dated 10/19/98 2:34:49 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> scholten1@MARSHALL.EDU writes:
>
> << > admittedly awkward "Vanagon" monikor?
>
>  It's spelled "moniker". Moniker! MONIKER! MONIKERMONIKERMONIKER!
>
>  Maybe we should all be constructive about this, and form a support group
>  for non-English majors. Count me in. :-)
>
>  Sam >>
>
> Sorry, but I tried with moniker(monikermonikermoniker). But my spellchecker
> didn't have the word in its database and the OED was all the way downstairs
> and besides, it was really just a typing error; these QWERTY keyboards take
> some time to get used to and just look how close together they put the keys
> for the letters "e" and "o" !  They might as well have put both letters on the
> same key!
>
> As for porn on the Vanagon list, I have noticed a drastic *drop* in "XXX" spam
> since I signed on. I've been thankful, yes, but I've also been puzzled by this
> turn. I complained to AOL months ago, to no avail (except a free month of
> service for my troubles), but hooking up with Vanagon.com has really cleaned
> up my mailbox (and really filled up my mailbox...). It would be sort of
> tempting to spam the porn spammers with an endless thread mulling over the
> pros and cons of daytime running lights---DRLs!!!).
>
> Michael
> 87 GL  (Vernon)