VANAGON archives -- October 1998, week 4 (#425)

Date:         Tue, 27 Oct 1998 07:39:05 -0800
Reply-To:     Kelly Bauman <bauman@ICAN.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         Kelly Bauman <bauman@ICAN.NET>
Subject:      OFF TOPIC Re: Plea for reducing the number of non-Vanagon content
              notes
Comments: To: vanagon@VANAGON.COM
In-Reply-To:  <36337B1A.64CDB7E@MCI2000.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
At 13:25 25-10-98 -0600, Blue Eyes wrote:
>NOTE.   Please state which would you prefer, OFF TOPIC or OT?  Or if
>someone has a better suggestion, let's go with that.  Those who
>disagree might explain why.

What was the topic again?  just kidding  :-)

I find the subject header very important.  FS or F or (long) or any other
indicator of content and format are a bonus.  Now let us launch the debate
of what is OFF TOPIC

Kelly Bauman
Delta, BC
'91 Westy

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.