Date:         Tue, 3 Nov 1998 14:54:51 -0800
Reply-To:     davidson <davidson@SIERRA.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         davidson <davidson@SIERRA.NET>
Subject:      Re: catalytic heater vs. propex?
Comments: To: William Dummitt <williamd@COMPUSERVE.COM>, vanagon@VANAGON.COM
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I paid $125 for my small Olympian unvented catalytic heater.
$700, the loss of under seat storage, and quicker battery consumption seem
like a high price for not having to open the window a crack.
Bill
90 Westy Syncro
Lake Tahoe

----------
> From: William Dummitt <williamd@COMPUSERVE.COM>
> To: vanagon@VANAGON.COM
> Subject: catalytic heater vs. propex?
> Date: Tuesday, November 03, 1998 2:30 PM
>
> Actually, the choices are fairly simple.  Both the Propex and the
Platinum
> Cat are good heaters.  The propex has a clean, out-of-sight installation
> for $600-700.  A vented Platinum Cat gives similar heating performance
for
> $330 or so, but lacks the clean installation.  You pays your money and
> takes your choice.  I've had both and liked both.  The propex is probably
> more desirable and is what I'm currently using, but also more money.
>
> An unvented heater would have to be considerably cheaper than the
Platinum
> Cat's $330 before I'd consider it.
>
> Bill
> www.geocities.com/yosemite/gorge/1706