Date:         Sun, 1 Nov 1998 22:32:05 -0800
Reply-To:     David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Subject:      Re: Wheels, once and for all, Bill in Lake Tahoe.
Comments: To: Malcolm Holser <mholser@ADOBE.COM>, vanagon@VANAGON.COM
In-Reply-To:  <199811020455.UAA05214@elroy.corp.Adobe.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The stock 16" rims are ET 34mm so they are actually closer to the trailing
arm.  I have 225/60 on my 16" and there is enough clearance for the 235s...
Personally I would go with the Michelin 4X4PC 205/80 16"... 29" tall and
narrow enough to get your chains on there.


At 20:56 11/1/98 -0800, Malcolm Holser wrote:
>I understand that the 16"er option had longer rear trailing arms to overcome
>this problem.  It would be great to have a set.  They also apparently changed
>the front fender lip, although it is difficult to see why this would be
>needed.
>
>If the wheels have less offset than stock (and therefore give a wider track)
>there would be less interference with the rear trailing arm.
>
>Malcolm H.


-- David Marshall                                    --
-- 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy, 87 Audi 5KSQ --
-- 85 VW Cabriolet, 88 2.0L VW Syncro 16" Double Cab --
-- Volkswagen Homepage   http://www.volkswagen.org   --
-- Volkswagen/Audi Parts http://parts.volkswagen.org --
-- mailto:david@volkswagen.org - Quesnel, BC, Canada --