Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 1998, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 17 Nov 1998 19:41:46 -0800
Reply-To:     David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         David Marshall <vanagon@VOLKSWAGEN.ORG>
Subject:      Re: Rear Bumper Concerns
Comments: To: MW575@AOL.COM, vanagon@VANAGON.COM
In-Reply-To:  <598756ba.3652269a@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

The rear bumper on my Double Cab is made out of 1/4" walled drill caseing - it weighs about 50 lbs and it isn't bending. But, if someone hits it - something must bend. 10 : 1 says it is my frame. At least I will do severe damage to the person who hit me!

At 20:44 11/17/98 EST, MW575@AOL.COM wrote: >Hey folks; > >I recently replaced the rear bumper on my '85 Westy with a new one (old one >was a little crunched from the PO). I guess I've always known how flimsy they >are, but installing the new one really got my attention. I doubt this thing >could withstand a 1 MPH bump and not fold in half. I'm not to concerned about >the bumper itself - they're relativity cheap compared to the other costs (and >hassle) that would occur from a small bump - say 5 or 10 mph. > >I don't like the looks of some of the aftermarket bumpers or the home-made >tubular ones. Are the non-carat bumpers used in the late 80's or 90 (looks >like black rubber from a distance - I haven't been close enough to examine) >any better supported than the cheap stuff used in the early 80's? > >I went to a local welder and asked about welding something that would fit >between the brackets the bumper bolts to, and would fit inside of the current >flimsy bumper. He said he could weld a 2" x 3" tube between the brackets, but >was concerned about what might happen in a crash to the frame - it could be >bent more than it would without such a modification. The welder said he >could do the job for $100, which seems like a cheap insurance policy in the >case of a 5-10 mile bump, if it would do the job of protecting some of the >engine. Any thoughts anyone? > >

-- David Marshall -- -- 78 1.8L VW Rabbit, 80 2.0L VW Caddy, 87 Audi 5KSQ -- -- 85 VW Cabriolet, 88 2.0L VW Syncro 16" Double Cab -- -- Volkswagen Homepage http://www.volkswagen.org -- -- Volkswagen/Audi Parts http://parts.volkswagen.org -- -- mailto:david@volkswagen.org - Quesnel, BC, Canada --


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.