Date:         Fri, 20 Nov 1998 19:07:20 -0500
Reply-To:     David Bogle / Architecture <bogle@BWAY.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@vanagon.com>
From:         David Bogle / Architecture <bogle@BWAY.NET>
Subject:      Re: Friday Frivolity: "Bus" vs. "Van"
Comments: To: vanagon@vanagon.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

> In a message dated 98-11-20 14:38:31 EST, cp@IX.NETCOM.COM writes:
>
> << I dislike referring to my '88 Westie as a "van" - I prefer to call it a
>  "bus".  For some reason, "bus" has a better karmic feeling to it.  To me,
>  the word "van" conjures up images of an old Chevy cargo van with a broken
>  8-track player, duct tape over the windows and a hostage in the back.
>
>  Definitely a "bus" man, myself.  You?
>   >>

IMHO, the Vanagon is a "bus" because it has the engine in the rear and the
driver is in front of the front wheels, just like in a Greyhound.  I always,
at least tried to always, refer to the '72 as a "bus" and enjoyed telling
others that it is not a van, but a bus.  I can't face losing that simple
pleasure, just because some marketing bozo conviced VW to name it a "vanagon"
for the American market.
--
Regards,
David Bogle
Brooklyn
'87 Vanagon GL Syncro Westfalia
'72 Campmobile 2.0L (For Sale: http://www.bway.net/~bogle )