I read Bob's suggestion to Martin: "A far more reliable indicator would be just the placement of a Vanagon in a wind tunnel, like the one down in Marietta, GA. Interested in donating some $'s? $3000/hour, via appointment, of course." I know you can spend $3,000 /hour for full blown wind tunnel testing. But paying a lot for something doesn't make it better than other options. If load testing in that wind tunnel is worth $3,000 per hour, then using my suggestion with the tow cable is worth over $3,000 per hour because mine covers the full running loads the motor "sees" except for transaxle losses, which are supposed to run between 3 and 5% according to sources I've read. Wind tunnel testing won't tell you how much power tire flexing eats. Remember those hot tires? Brakes drag, wheel bearing impose loads. It all adds together to create the road horsepower loads you can't avoid on the highway. The wind tunnel is a wonderful tool. It isolates the most progressively important load for high speed running. But it's not a good approximation for total road horsepower requirements unless you use one with the moving belt and the tow cable. Hum, sounds vaguely familiar. It must be better if you have to pay a lot of money for it, right? You can read that VW claimed the Vanagon had a .44 coefficient of drag in an early Road & Track Vanagon Road Test which is repeated in the archives. Use the search string, "Road Test." Granted, that wasn't a Westy, but it should apply to most Vanagon based vehicles throughout the entire production run because the body shape stayed about the same. Too bad it's not close to the Vixen motohome's .30 coefficient of drag. The nice thing about dirty designs is that improvements are usually easy to make, where as improving a Vixen's .30 CD or the Passat's .27 CD would be really tough. It would be very interesting to know if people's attempts at reducing Vanagon coefficient of drag actually work. Just because something is sold with lots of "aerodynamic improvement" claims, appears trendy, and "all the racers are doing" it, will not impress me unless it lowers that cable towing tension. If that $420 air dam doesn't lower the towing tension, it was a damned poor investment. It wouldn't surprise me if those smooth contoured high top modified Vanagons actually have lower wind drag than stockers. It also wouldn't surprise me to learn that even the manufacturers of them don't know because they've never bothered to test their own product's effects. Confusion reigns, but it never pours, John |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.