Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 1999, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sat, 9 Jan 1999 14:06:48 -0500
Reply-To:     "Robert A. Alexander" <satcong@VOL.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Robert A. Alexander" <satcong@VOL.COM>
Subject:      AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT REPORTING VS CALLING THE GENDARMES!
Comments: To: Blue Eyes <lvlearn@MCI2000.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

John - This is quite a subject. Enough so, one of my 10th grade daughters is going to do a report on it in English.

Tennesse statues require only the "reporting" to local law enforcement officials of any accident involving death, injury, or property damage over fifty ($50) dollars. In addition, "reportable accidents", those involving death, injury or property damage in excess of four hundred ($400) dollars, require reporting such to the TN Department of Public Safety within 20 days.

There was no specific mention of when one HAS to call the authorities and sit there, after an accident, and wait for a law enforcement officer to show up and make a report!

This is where it gets interesting! I called our local police (Soddy Daisy), Chattanooga (suburb of Soddy Daisy) police, Hamilton County Sheriff's Department and the TN Highway Patrol. Little agreement amongst the four OTHER than what's spelled out in the Statues.

Total agreement, though, that one could not be prosecuted for "leaving the scene" IF both parties exchanged information at the site and agreed to leave the scene. Obviously, it seems to entail more of a "common sense" approach than a "legalese" one.

Apparently the determination of whom to charge with "leaving the scene" is made by one NOT having the "exchanged information" on their person! The example I was given was the scenario of an accident where both parties agree to let their insurance companies handle the problem, they exchange DL numbers, Insurance Co. names & policy numbers, tag numbers, location, etc. NO problem as long as both parties make a report to the locals & the State. THEN, the scenario where an accident occurs, argument results and one party leaves. Other party stays, calls the authorities, the "one party" is found and asked to produce the "information" about the other party involved in the accident, can't do it and an arrest is made.

ALL four offices made the point to me that immediate, on-site accident investigation is more of a "civil" matter than a "criminal" matter, for our own protection.

I did get a few good examples, though, of how one can get their butt in a sling. An accident where both cars sustained minimal damage, but broken glass was left on the roadway, three mailboxes were destroyed and a speed limit sign was demolished. Both drivers agreed to let their insurance companies handle it and left the scene. The authorities arrested them both for leaving the scene, mainly for leaving glass on the roadway.

BOB - WA4RRN '85GL


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.