Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 1999, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 14 Jan 1999 11:55:05 -0500
Reply-To:     John Anderson <janderson@IOLINC.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         John Anderson <janderson@IOLINC.NET>
Subject:      Re: OFF-TOPIC: Re:USA Vs. Japan vs Europe
Comments: To: vanagon@vanagon.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

>> >My car was indeed assembled in Pennsylvania. However, that is NOT the >> >deciding factor in how a car feels when you drive it. It's the engineering >> >behind it. > >To the below I'd say I strongly disagree. I test drove some of the Mexican made >Golfs/Jettas a few years ago as well as had friends who owned same and they were >problematic and felt poorly assembled though they were "German Engineered" as

DING, DING, DING, right on. The A2 cars made in Mexico were JUNK, our '89 had paint defects out of the factory, trim fallling off all round, and mechanical issues, American built A2's (sort of rare '85 only?) were just as bad, maybe worse. The American A1 was identically never equal the German in fit or finish. I've seen a lot of ragged '88-'91ish Mexican Jettas, particularly paint/body problems as they age in the mid Atlantic, and I mean ragged 2-3 years AGO. Every German GLI, or regular Jetta I've seen has been impeccable considering their ages, and not I think just because the GLI's warranted better treatment. In them I get a European feel, in a Mexican car, not really. I know a lot of people who had trim issues abound on the first '93 and '94 A3 cars as well, I'm unimpressed how paint again is holding out on a friends '95. But it works the other way as well, my '90 Corrado was a VERY early US market model and as the damn things were nearly hand built it had a myriad of trim problems as well, mechanics and paint were spectacular however. '90 Passat was a transmission nightmare but very nice otherwise. On both those it was fairly annoying as it was not as if the cars had not been out in Europe for at least a year to sort out problems. Still they felt very solid and very German as do most Corrado and Passats of the early 90's. For as much as VW has come back and touts their wonderful warranty, I'll be suprised if A3's A4's and Beetles coming out of Mexico hold up that well for people like me who want to keep the cars over 5 years. The admission of this is the fact that second owner only gets that 5/50. And of course then you have to find out who your DSM is and grab him by the balls if anything out of the ordinary happens to need warranty work anyway. To me if it didn't leave Wolfsburg or Hanover it ain't worth driving. May put me into an Audi in a few years I guess at least they mostly leave Germany, that TT coupe looks wonderful, or is it to be built side by side with the bug?

John janderson@iolinc.net


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.