Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 1999, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 15 Jan 1999 20:55:17 -0500
Reply-To:     vwmark@CONCENTRIC.NET
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Mark Upton <vwmark@CONCENTRIC.NET>
Subject:      Re: Audi Shmaudi lets talk Volvo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Not to be a wise guy ,nice speech Ken !Now where is my kit? -----Original Message----- From: KENWILFY@AOL.COM <KENWILFY@AOL.COM> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> Date: Friday, January 15, 1999 7:51 PM Subject: Re: Audi Shmaudi lets talk Volvo

><<Reliable they may be... but I know one of the reasons that people replace >the engines with the Audi is to increase the horsepower (since the engine is >shot you may as well.. :) The '78 244 Volvo I worked on had a B21 in it I >believe and was only rated at 99 hp if memory serves correct... the Audis >are just as reliable from what I can see and the lower hp unit (2.1) is 115 >hp... the 2.3 is 130... if I had the choice I know which I'd pick...>> > >Not to mention you would have to find someone to make an adapter plate, >flywheel, wiring harness, coolant hoses, probably raise the deck lid, engine >support, motor mounts, and ten other things that you probably haven't thought >of yet. I have. >Although my 5-cylinder kit has been criticized by some folks for being pricey >you have to consider what is going into it. The whole conversion has been >thought out and tested. For $2700 you get everything you need to put the >motor in but the motor. >I really don't think this is a high price when you consider the time and >effort that this is saving you. We test all the components (wiring harness, >etc) so that it will be right when you get it. No experimenting, necessary. >Engine conversions are not cheap anyway you slice them. If you get the bare >bones stuff and try to work the rest out your self you are going to spend alot >of time (my time is worth money how about yours), you are going to spend a >bunch of money getting the additional parts made that you need, and then you >are going to have an "experimental" van that you will have to keep close to >home while you get the bugs out (just letting the special parts you bought >gather dust in your garage because you figure out that you have bitten off >more than you can chew with this conversion). >To me, having a bolt-up installation with all the experimenting and headaches >taken out, is worth something. Don't fall for false economy. >However I am always trying to get new parts sources for our kit to make it >better and cheaper. Hopefully both of these will happen as we do more and >more conversions. >Thanks >Ken Wilford >www.VanAgain.com >John 3:16 >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.