Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (January 1999, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 17 Jan 1999 15:37:40 -0500
Reply-To:     "Carroll A. Smith" <cas@DIGITAL.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Carroll A. Smith" <cas@DIGITAL.NET>
Subject:      Re: corrosion & anodes (long)
Comments: To: YauMan Chan <YAUMAN@CCHEM.BERKELEY.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

YauMan Chan wrote:

> >>> Austin <austins@IX.NETCOM.COM> 01/16 10:36 PM >>> > Thus the question for all the electron cognizenti out there - does an a= node > have to be electrically attached to a vehicle ground[...] >

This is a case where a little electrochemistry may not be enough .......

> Here's a 2 minute lesson in electrochemistry: > A battery is created whenever you have two "dis-similar" metals in cont= act with each other or through a third medium call the electrolyte. Thus= , you can stick a copper pin and a zinc pin into a lemon or potato and li= ght up a light bulb - you have created a battery. We can look up the diff= erent metals "Potential volts" in any chemistry handbook under "Electroch= emical Series." Thus under Copper is listed .0158v and under Zinc is -0.7= 63v, and so the Cu/Zn lemon battery gets 0.158-(-0.763) or 0.92 Volts. W= hile it is acting as a battery, the metal from the Zn side will migrate t= o the Cu side as ions - thus the Zn side will be "eroded" while the Cu si= de will get coated with Cu+lemon juice compounds.

Not always. Usually water is involved in its ionized state, ie H+ and OH-= , or if you prefer HOH+ for the cation, in secondary reactions at both = the cathode and anode. This is why hydrogen and sometimes oxygen is liber= ated at the surfaces of the reacting electrodes.

> The kicker here is that the higher the potential difference between the= metals, the more reactive this process is.. I.e. faster it will happen.

True if there is no inhibiting surface reactions which in the case of alu= minum there almost always is. So for aluminum, generally not true.

> The key, however, is that there has to be an electrolyte for this to ha= ppen. Acids (lemon juice) make good electrolyte and most base/alkalies d= o > not. Salt solutions also make good electrolytes.

No problem here!

> > > This is what is suppose to happen when the coolant acts as an electroly= te between the engine and the radiator. The radiator is copper Cu

Many radiators are aluminum, I do not know what your VW has.

> and the engine is something else - what? If the engine is steel, with = is mostly Iron (Fe) or cast ion, the potential differences is only (Cu=3D= 0.158 and Fe=3D-0.036 ) 0.194volts). If the engine is Aluminum (Al) the= potential difference is (Cu=3D0.158 and Al=3D-1.706) 1.864 volts. As yo= u can see, the reaction rate is substantially higher in the case of an al= uminum engine.

Not necessarily.

> > > Between the engine and the radiator, for most cars, there only common c= urrent path is the coolant which acts as electrolyte. Thus we have create= d a gigantic battery and when the reaction is taking place, the engine ge= ts "eroded" while the copper radiator gets clotted up (Al migrates and de= posits to the Cu.) From the above paragraph, you can see that the cast i= ron engine is a lot less "reactive" than the Aluminum engine, ie you can = make a much battery with Al and Cu than with Fe and Cu. The engine is th= e anode and the copper radiator is the cathode. > > To stop, this nonsense is easy. Do not immerse these metals in an elect= rolyte.

Yup! Go aircooled.

> Make the coolant alkyl and not acidic. Make sure the is no "salt" in th= e coolant. "Salt" used in the chemical sense is not just table salt. Pho= sphate compound is a good salt. This is what all the fuss is about the b= lue phosphate-free coolants. > > Now, in the case of the boat it is not so easy. The hull, if metal, or = any metal parts in contact with water is the anode, sea water is the elec= trolyte and mother earth is the cathode.

> So you have a HUGE battery and the reaction is very fast and furious. = Sea water is a very very good electrolyte, in fact as good as sulfuric ac= id used in batteries!

Wrong! If this were so aluminum hulls would disappear into the ocean. The= y do not. In fact one of the longest lived trash in the ocean is the comm= on aluminum beer can. Aluminum hulled boats are among the longest survivi= ng hulls known.

> Here's a case where a sacrificial anode is effective. A metal, more ac= tive on the electrochemical series than the metal of the boat is immersed= in water, but in electrical contact with the boat, "moves" the electroly= sis action from the boat to the sacrificial anode. > > So, while a sacrificial anode works wonders in marine applications wher= e the anode is Fe compound like steel, it is not very useful in the Vanag= on engine. For it to be effective, first, it must be metal more negative= than Al on the electrochemical series and there are very few, Al being o= ne of the most negative of common metals. You are left the likes of Magn= esium (-2.3v) or Potassium (-2.94v) or some Al compound made for that pur= pose.

Sacrificial anodes are alloys that are "doped" to bring their open circui= t potentials high enough and current capacity high enough to be good sacr= ificial anodes. Mercury used to be used, magnesium is most likely a major= component, maybe lithium or potassium.

> Second, it must be immersed in the cooling jacket of the engine itself = and be in electrical contact with the aluminum and immersed in the coolan= t.

This is exactly correct and the major reason that dangling an anode into = the reservoir of your engine's coolant tank will do no good worthy of men= tion.

> > > Yau-Man Chan > 87 GL

No disrespect for Yau-Man is intended here. I earned my living as a marin= e corrosion scientist for many years and the practical aspects of corrosi= on control are not as simple as electrochemical texts might suggest. A g= ood standard reference is "Corrosion Engineering" by Fontana & Green, McG= raw-Hill. My issue is dated 1967; there are probably later editions and o= ther texts as well.

Aluminum is a most remarkable metal. Finely divided and mixed with an oxi= dizer such as potassium nitrate it is a powerful explosive. Conversely in= some chemical environment it forms tight corrosion resistant films that = resist corrosion to a remarkable degree. For aluminum engines I would use= ONLY what the factory recommends and avoid chlorides (brackish water for= example) at all costs. Distilled water would even be good insurance if y= ou have water supplies from coastal sources. There are some parts in the = coolant path made of steel (head studs for example) that do corrode prefe= rentially but the aluminum will corrode in crevices where the inhibitive = effects of the coolant do not reach freely. Free copper ion can be devast= ating to aluminum as some saltwater sailors found when they painted their= aluminum propeller gear casing with copper antifouling paint. Copper rea= cts withthe aluminum, sets up a local corrosion cell, and perforates the = aluminum in sea water in short order. So don't put any copper pipes inline with your coolant to an aluminum engine. (This is= why I doubt that your radiator is copper.) Another problem with aluminum= boats is that some owners like to hook up battery chargers and other ele= ctrical devices to their boats while in dock. If there is a fault in the = isolation of the power, current will accelerate the corrosion process. Mo= st marine operators are aware of this and go to some lengths to avoid the= problem.

Makes you wonder why you bought this thing, doesn't it|?

cas


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.