Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 1999, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 18 Feb 1999 22:50:13 -0800
Reply-To:     "Laurence W. Burt" <lwburt@SPIRITONE.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         "Laurence W. Burt" <lwburt@SPIRITONE.COM>
Subject:      Re: G60 motor in an '88 westy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Mark R Drovdahl wrote:
>
> Still doing research on the G60. Thanks to everyone who's contributed to my
> cause. I've got a few more questions to bounce off the collective brain.
>
Hey Mark


This is Larry, new on the list as of tonight. I have a 1986 GL Westy,
which I bought from the original owner 4 1/2 years ago at about 115 K.
Original engine, never opened up. Last summer at about 155K the heads
started leaking terribly, so bad in fact that my local mechanic refused
to due the usual head replacement (1800+) saying he couldn't guarantee
it because the block was corroded. So my options were:


1. Get someone less scrupulous to do the heads $1500-$1800?
2. Get a used engine--really a crap shoot. The best deal I found had
117K on it and would cost over $1000 plus several hundred in labor.
3. Get a "rebuilt" engine from a California outfit for about 2400, plus
several hundred to install, but again my usual mechanic said they
wouldn't do it because they'd had bad experiences in the past--some were
ok, some not, but if there was a problem it was hard to get them to come
through without a long wait and hassle.
4. Get a "rebuilt" engine from some Canadian outfit that supplies VW
dealers, and have my local mechanic install it. I opted for this and
haven't regretted it at all. The total cost was over $3000, but I plan
to keep the van for another 10 years and feel like I got a bargain.


I have a much smoother engine, no leaks! A little more power, a little
better mileage, much better driveability, no more idiot lights coming on
randomly, and as a result I'm enjoying and using my van a lot more!


If I understand your post correctly, you have a synchro. This is a major
reason your van is underpowered. I thought about getting a synchro, but
decided against it because of the substantial extra weight, poorer gas
mileage, lower gearing, mechanical complexity, poorer turning radius,
etc. The few times per year I need the traction I carry chains, but I'll
have to admit there have been several times I've wished for a synchro!


Larry Burt, lwburt@spiritone.com
Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!

Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com

The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.