Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (March 1999, week 2)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:43:42 PST
Reply-To:     vwvanman@EXCITE.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Lilley <vwvanman@EXCITE.COM>
Subject:      Re: Waterboxer hop-up vs. swap
Comments: To: Eric Pickering <mv_54@OMALP1.OMERESA.OHIO.GOV>
Comments: cc: vanagon@vanagon.com
Content-Type: text/plain

Eric,

I did a upgrade to my 1988 Vanagon 2.1L wasserboxer. I counterweighted the crank, increased cam lift and duration, 1.25 ratio rockers, cromoly push rods and spring retainers, solid rocker shafts, Walker Turbo muffler, Rotating assembly balanced, pistons and rods balanced, ceramic coatings on ALL parts that touch heat and head sealing surface, Bosch quad tip platinum plugs, matched ported exhaust, heads, air runners, oil pump, throttle body, racing valve locks, racing clutch bolts, five speed tranny with locking diff and .70 fifth gear. I can get to 75 mph with a 1.03 fourth gear, in fifth I can cruise at 70 to 75 easy, been to 85 mph once to avoid getting stuck behind slow traffic. My gas milage has remained at 20 mph whether in city or highway. I am having to retune the FI. It was set with a wornout air flow meter before I owned the van. I have spent @$6000. But that included all new German hoses, thermostat and housing, water pipe (passenger side plastic coolant housing) water pump, AFM, brake master cylinder, clutch master and slave, new rotors, pads, caliper rebuild kits, bearings, muffler wrap, wire covers, seals, plus many tools and other parts. I used stainless steel hardware on 90 percent of the engine. This is some of what I have done so far...

Robert

> Has anyone done a comparison of pros and cons for an engine swap versus > a nicely modified waterboxer? Looking at things like ratio rockers, > chip work, flowed heads (and polished), maybe bigger valves, camshaft, > perf. exhaust, better intake, even lighter connecting rods for higer > RPMs and lest fatique, etc. It might be cheaper and/or easier to just > make a bad-ass waterboxer engine than spend the time money and headache > on a swap. I know head mods along with some of the others can make a BIG > HP and torque difference. I certainly want to explore it before I do a > swap.

_______________________________________________________ Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite.com/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.