Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 1999, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 16 Apr 1999 18:58:26 -0400
Reply-To:     EMZ <vw4x4@FYI.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         EMZ <vw4x4@FYI.NET>
Subject:      Re: Syncro tire dia. spec. - tolerances? Ask Mr. Science!
Comments: To: "Fitz-Randolph, Douglas" <dfrandolph@TALKAM.NET>
In-Reply-To:  <C1A47AF64D80D01198AC00A024CC3499852C9C@TA_EXCHANGE1>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

NO, That what it was put in there for. But! I would do whatever I could to easy it's work, by keeing things as close to the same as possible.

Eric 86-VW4x4 vw4x4@fyi.net 72-240z Pittsburgh, PA USA 1936-Chrysler

On Fri, 16 Apr 1999, Fitz-Randolph, Douglas wrote:

> >Measure by wrapping a string around the outside of the tire...> > > >Ahh... but don't forget you have to do that with the tire ON the car...> > > Thanks Bill and Brent. Is this a Friday thing? Or maybe it's some new list > member initiation rite? :) > > Seriously... assuming the tires you buy will be of uniform dimensions if > they are the same brand, model and size, you can figure all this out without > driving on strings, etc. After all, unless we're doing speedo calculations, > it isn't the actual dimensions we care about - only the differences - right? > So your average, brand new 195/75R14 tire has a diameter of 648 mm, a > circumference of 2036 mm and revolves 790 times per mile. If it doesn't, > it'll at least be close enough that the difference is irrelevant. Every mm > of diameter +/- accounts for +/- 3.1417(pi, you know) mm of circumference. > Each +/- 2.58 mm of circumference accounts for approx. +/- 1 revolution per > mile. "Approx." because as the circumference increases, the mm to generate > another revolution increases as well - and vice-versa. > > So it seems to me that if my tires are approx. 648 mm in diameter, a > difference in tread depth (sampled from various points on each tire, of > course) of 1 mm x 2 (for each side of the tire) would give me tires with > diameters of 648 and 646 mm respectively. Which would yield circumferences > of 2036 and 2030 respectively. Which would mean that the tires were rotating > 790 and 793 times per mile respectively. > > Now... if I had to take into account tire load and its influence on revs per > mile *so would someone with brand new tires* - so I don't see the relevance > in considering it. I'm figuring - and I'll admit perhaps incorrectly - that > the difference in recommended tire pressure front to rear most compensate > for whatever effects load might have on the tires. > > So will a difference of 3 revolutions per mile toast my VC? I sure don't > know. Anyone who does - please let me - and everyone else - know! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brent Christensen [SMTP:bpchristensen@MINDSPRING.COM] > > Sent: Friday, April 16, 1999 1:49 PM > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Subject: Re: Syncro tire dia. spec. - tolerances? > > > > Syncro tire dia. spec. - tolerances?Ahh... but don't forget you have to do > > that with the tire ON the car - the weight of the car will change the > > rolling circumference of the tire... (This is the way you have to > > calibrate a bicycle odometer in order to be accurate) Then of course, > > you'd > > want to make sure you used a string with very low elasticity, since you > > could get an inaccurate reading my stretching it taught... > > > > I think my wife would think I'm crazy if she saw me out in the driveway > > laying down string under my tires and carefully driving over it, then > > marking it, then backing up and measuring it. > > > > Brent Christensen > > '89 GL Syncro Westy > > '91 Taurus SHO (For Sale) > > '95 Cherokee Sport > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Davidson > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM > > Sent: Friday, April 16, 1999 9:43 AM > > Subject: Re: Syncro tire dia. spec. - tolerances? > > > > > > The measurement you want to compare is NOT the tread... it's the > > circumference of the tire near the center (diameter is too hard to > > measure).... Measure by wrapping a string around the outside of the tire, > > mark the spot on the string where it meets itself.... then see if that's > > the > > same spot for the other tires... or how far off it is.... > > Bill > > 90 Westy Syncro > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Fitz-Randolph, Douglas <dfrandolph@TALKAM.NET> > > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > > Date: Friday, April 16, 1999 9:31 AM > > Subject: Syncro tire dia. spec. - tolerances? > > > > > > Brent Christensen wrote: ...My understanding is that all tires for a > > Syncro > > need to be within 2.5 mm. > > Is this the correct spec?... > > I'd really curious if anybody knows this spec *for sure*. > > The tires I've been running for about 800 mi. were purchased slightly > > used, > > with 2 of them having about 1-2mm less tread than the other 2. In > > retrospect, I probably shouldn't have bought them, but the difference > > seemed > > so small at the time... If it's going to end up messing up my drivetrain > > though, I'll replace them. > > The manager of my local highly reputable tire shop said the difference - > > hardly noticeable - wouldn't cause a problem - he seemed pretty > > knowledgeable about various awd systems (Subaru, Volvo, etc.) - and he > > certainly had an easy opportunity to sell me a new set of tires, didn't > > he?! > > The local VW dealer would only say "They all have to be the same size and > > treadwear" and didn't know anything about acceptable tolerances - not much > > help. > > I know all about the whole replacing all 4 (or 5) if one is bad thing, but > > how close do they really have to be? The 1-2 mm difference only translates > > into several rotations per mile - it seems as if turning while driving > > normally would account for almost that much rotational difference on its > > own. (Would you eventually ruin your VC if you drove the same direction > > around a racetrack for miles and miles? Probably not, but I'm not an > > expert. > > And assuming 500 laps at Daytona won't blow the VC, would it make sense > > to > > match the treadwear left to right rather than front to back? Hmmm...) > > Any VW Syncro engineers out there? > > Doug Fitz-Randolph > > Yarmouth, ME > > dfrandolph@talkam.net > > '90 Syncro >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.