Date:         Mon, 17 May 1999 19:21:03 -0700
Reply-To:     Joel Walker <jwalker@URONRAMP.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Joel Walker <jwalker@URONRAMP.NET>
Subject:      Re: Rude Comments about Vanagons on the Web
Comments: To: John-Reed Maffeo <rlpa80@EMAIL.SPS.MOT.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

From: John-Reed Maffeo <rlpa80@EMAIL.SPS.MOT.COM>
Subject: Rude Comments about Vanagons on the Web

>FWIW,
>http://consumerlawpage.com/article/4by4-rollovers.shtml


ha. sounds like a how-to for ambulance chasers: buy the wreck, get
lots of photos (how to stand so your photos are nice and clear!), and
best of all, How to select the Best Lawyer (one who has 'experience in
dealing with companies')'.
yup. that's what we all need.

so if the Vanagon has a high rollover TENDENCY, why don't we see more
of them in the junkyard as rollovers? in 19 years, i've seen exactly
ONE vanagon rollover in junkyard ... and i've forgotten how many
t-bones. no blood or deaths in any of the vanagon wrecks. i've not
seen any Isuzu Troopers as rollovers in junkyards, either .. but we
all know (cause Consumer Reports told us!) how dangerous they are!!!

bullshit. excuse moi Francais. ;)

joel