In a message dated 6/11/99 3:17:47 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Steve@Schwenk-Law.com writes: << Please, Ken, if you have doubts, read the scientific literature, not EPA. You can't be serious that this is all a wacky conspiracy. steve >> Hey all I was doing was asking questions. To me the whole thing doesn't make sense. They make a big deal about how that R-12 is going to mess up the ozone layer, then they approve a replacement for it (R-134a) that is a known "green house" gas. So we don't mess up the environment one way we mess it up another (assuming the ozone hole idea and the global warming ideas are both actually true). I just wanted to know if anyone else saw the inconsistancies here. As I have said before I am not a scientist or a chemist. But I hopefully do have the common sense God gave Lettuce (which some scientists or chemists seem to lack). Not a Flame. Where is Super Bulley when you really need him? Ken Wilford Van-Again John 3:16 |
Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of
Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection
will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!
Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com
The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.
Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.