Date:         Wed, 23 Jun 1999 13:48:56 -0700
Reply-To:     Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Karl Wolz <wolzphoto@WORLDNET.ATT.NET>
Subject:      Re: Volunteers needed!
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

No offense to you, Ray, but I have noticed, and accept, a lot of sloppy
spelling and word usage in this and other groups with which I correspond.  I
don't have a problem with this unless the meaning is obscured, which brings
me to my question - "What the hell is unhinded?".

Again, no offense intended.

Karl Wolz

----- Original Message -----
From: Ray Hunnam <hunnam@PNC.COM.AU>
To: <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 5:11 AM
Subject: Re: Volunteers needed!


> Could Not have said it better myself.
>
> I think that a group of Volunteers with the computer knowledge should get
> together and discuss this matter.  Their decision will then be reported
back
> to the list and we can all then vote on the preferred option.
>
> I do not have the computer knowledge to join the discussion group but I am
> prepared to leave it to those who know.
>
> So you guys lets get it organised and thrash it out.
>
> I would offer a suggestion though.   No offence David,  but it may be
better
> for the List Administrators of both Lists to sit it our and have someone
> else head the group.  That way you can present your case unhinded.
>
>
> Ray Hunnam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: KENWILFY@AOL.COM <KENWILFY@AOL.COM>
> To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM>
> Date: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 1:53
> Subject: Re: Volunteers needed!
>
>
> >Do you think that we should start a special mailing list to just discuss
> what
> >we are going to do about Gerry?  I really think that this needs
discussion
> >and thought before we just throw money at the problem.  I am all for
> getting
> >the computer components from David's employer (to thank him for his
> kindness
> >to us), but we need to talk about exactly what machine would run the list
> and
> >the archives the best and also what OS would require the least amount of
> >maintenance (I am thinking of you David) while crashing the least.  We
also
> >have to consider that we have already invested some money in software
that
> >uses Windows NT.  However if NT is going to keep crashing all the time I
> >would rather spend the money and get an OS (and the listserv software to
go
> >with it) that isn't so crash prone.  So I think we should start a
> discussion
> >list for all interested listmembers (and computer savvy listmembers) at
> >www.onelist.com.  That way we can discuss this at length and not clog up
> the
> >Vanagon list.
> >What do you think?
> >Ken Wilford
> >Van-Again
> >John 3:16
> >
>