Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (July 1999, week 1)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Fri, 2 Jul 1999 13:24:56 PDT
Reply-To:     vwvanman@EXCITE.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Robert Lilley <vwvanman@EXCITE.COM>
Subject:      Re: removal of weight from flywheel and cam lift
Comments: To: vanagon@vanagon.com
Content-Type: text/plain

>I was wondering about the how you'll go about reducing the > weight of your flywheel.

simply machine the weight from the outside edge of the flywheel.

You said that you'd remove from the flywheel > the same amount of weight as was added in counter ballancing the crank. > I was just curious if what you intend to do is remove the weight from > precisely calculated locations on the flywheel so that the rotional > inertia of the crank/flywheel system will be returned to what it was > originally, before the crank was counterballance??

No, from the outer perimeter only.

> While researching you upgrades and your past VW bus work, how did you > learn about cams? Like, what effects on engine performance does lift > and duration and gear indexing the cam have?? Did you read up on this, > if so would you tell me the references? Or did you talk to the cam > shops?

Talking with cam experts at can shops.

> So, what was the increase of lift and duration that you > specified for your cam?

>Why specify additional lift if you were already > going to use 1.25 ratio rockers??

The use of the ratio rockers helped to increase bottom end torque to offset the loss of torque by changing the duration and allow for more breathing at highter rpms. With a change in duration, the power band moves up the rpm range. Plus the lifters and valve train do not have to travel as far to obtain the additional lift increase, so reciprocal weight does not increase as much as with just going to a larger lift. Less were on cam lobes due to not as steep ramps. Valve is also let down "gentler" do to not having the ramps steeper. > > I've got a new header system--the S&S system and your point about the > donut washer has got me a bit worried. Do header systems for other > make autos have a similar set up to allow for flex?

I was wrong in my analysis. I had had my Vanagon for a short time and had not taken my exhaust off yet. It does not flex as I had mistakenly thought so.

The importance of the doughnut gaskets are to allow it to align up.

It was nice to read that you advocate ceramic > coating as well.

I like the fact that my head gasket problems woes are over...

Robert

_______________________________________________________ Get your free, private email at http://mail.excite.com/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.