Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 12:00:50 -0400
Reply-To: bmn <bmn@IGLOU.COM>
Sender: Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From: bmn <bmn@IGLOU.COM>
Subject: Re: GEX -- libel and slander; Perfection rule?????
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
"Horace K. Sawyer" wrote:
> Is GEX really that bad? I do not know. Being a thief is a harsh label to
> brand someone with. I would hate to be in business and be forced to keep
> all my customers 100% satisfied all of the time each and every day or face
> threats of being branded with "stealing." It seems we have come to believe
> we are entitled to absolute perfection in every conceivable aspect of human
> existence. What a silly concept. Show me the Vanagon that never needs
> maintenance. Show me the metal that will not rust.
> How would you do things differently if you were an engine rebuilder? If
> you were GEX?
> How about stating some facts to support your contentions about this
> alleged stealing.
Perfect? No... consistent, yes. When a mfr does make mistakes, you
expect them to stand behind their products. If you were in business,
your customers would and should expect items to perform as they should.
How is that unfair?
I won't comment whether or not the libel is justified but I will say
that in the last 3-4 weeks I've been asking folks about new engines. I
remember before mine died there were consistent horrendous stories about
GEX products and support. With the latest intense search for a decent
engine provider, this has resurfaced with a larger unsatisfied (to say
the least) base of folks with negative experiences. Given that I have
asked everyone at van shows about replacement engines, asked many
installers, and asked here 3 years ago and again lately, and given that
without exception ALL of the stories (over 300 EASY) are frighteningly
similar, I'd say they have a serious problem. I have no experience with
them. When I look at the many I've talked to who have, I won't be
considering them for my new engine. I've been saving for 2 years to get
my van back on the road and don't want or need it to go bad now.
--
Please remove "faux." from my reply-to address above in order to send a
reply. I'll try anything to try and foil the junk email mutants.
|