Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 1999, week 5)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:12:10 EDT
Reply-To:     KENWILFY@AOL.COM
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         KENWILFY@AOL.COM
Subject:      Subaru was: 2.1l engine for sale too $900.
Comments: To: JKrevnov@aol.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

I spoke with the guy for about 30 mins about the conversion since I had considered and investigated it before deciding the 5-cylinder was the way to go. However I know that all people are different and that maybe some folks want to go the Subaru way and that's OK by me.

Anyway the Subaru swap sounds really good when you talk to the folks at Kennedy Engineering about it and the price for thier kit, and the parts looks good. However, as I found with my 5-cylinder kits, no conversion is cheap. It is either costs money or it costs time (time= money for those of you who don't know). In the guy that I spoke with case it cost him lots and lots of time. He got a motor for around $1000 and he said the wiring harness was a nightmare. The whole thing took him several months and finally he had to take it to a local Subaru shop to get it running. Then he had a problem with some coolant lines catching fire.

All in all when you do a swap like this you are on your own. You get the kit and some sketchy instructions from Kennedy (some things aren't included in the instructions) but you are essentially a test case. You turn your van into a test vehicle. You experiment around with what coolant hoses to use, where to route them, how to route your wiring harness, your intake setup, everything. Now you drive the van a while. This part falls off, that part breaks, it is a test van after all.

The final result (after sinking over $6000 into the conversion) is that the guy is happy with the end result (would you admit it if you weren't?) He says that he would like to re-gear the tranny a little though as the engine makes it's power in the higher rpm range and the van tranny is not geared quite right.

I chose the 5-cylinder swap over this one because of two main factors. One is has been throughly tested and is the OE setup in South Africa (VW thought it was a good idea). Second it keeps the van all German and all VW/Audi. Now you can take the van to a VW dealer anywhere on the road and get it worked on because they are actually more familiar with the 5-cylinder engine than they are with the waterboxer. That's my 2 cents on this subject. Anyone else who has done a Subaru conversion is encouraged to speak up on this topic. Thanks Ken Wilford Van-Again John 3:16


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.