Vanagon EuroVan
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (September 1999, week 3)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Thu, 16 Sep 1999 22:25:34 -0500
Reply-To:     al brase <braseelec@FORBIN.COM>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         al brase <braseelec@FORBIN.COM>
Organization: al brase electric
Subject:      Re: A Cautionary Tale on Titles
Comments: To: DAVIDTHEKM@aol.com
Comments: cc: perring@texas.net, type2@type2.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

DAVIDTHEKM@aol.com wrote: <snip> > The moral of the story - don't ever buy a vehicle without seeing the title > with your own eyes. You must be sure the person who's selling it is actually > the owner. You know what they say about assumptions. It's TRUE. I'm proof. > I guess the other moral is if you begin to get bad vibes about a seller, run > - don't walk - away, no matter how attractive the vehicle appears to be. I > still love the A'wagen. Sometimes I just go out and sit in it and make > engine sounds out loud. Vroom, Vroom!! However, I don't know if it's going > to be worth the aggravation by the time this is over. > > David Hunt '68 Crewcab '74 Thing '82 Vanagon yard ornament David: I once bought a burned 911 Porsche from an attorney in Arkansas and he showed me a procedure for making sure you get the title: Pay for the vehicle with a check and in the memo section write "title attached- 1974 Porsche serial number 911xxxxxxxx". Then alert your bank that you have written such a check (They'd probably catch it anyway, but better safe than sorry!) Apparently the check is not a valid instrument without the attachment. The really important thing is that the payee believes this! This works really well in the case of where the seller has money borrowed against the vehicle, the seller has to settle up with the bank to make the check valid. The seller never has as much incentive to dig thru his papers or get a duplicate as when he's got his hand out for the money. Another way would be to get a third party that you both trust to hold the money. Attorneys are a good idea here, but I imagine it would cost you $50-$100 just for such a service. Most people want to do the right thing and probably will with a little nudge. Probably B****'s biggest motivation was to make the thing physically go away and not the $600 so much. So, hauling it away before he found the title was maybe your second mistake! Best to never impugn this B****'s character (don't call his friends goobers) till after you have the title in hand, if he does have it anyway! You can go to small claims court (if you live in the same state!), but that's always a hassle and an expense if you get a lawyer. Al Brase 69 double cab (I always learn more from my mistakes than my successes!)


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.