Vanagon EuroVan
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 1999, week 4)Back to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGON (or change settings)ReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font
Date:         Sun, 26 Dec 1999 18:44:19 -0800
Reply-To:     Susan Bernavich <susanb@WIZZARDS.NET>
Sender:       Vanagon Mailing List <vanagon@gerry.vanagon.com>
From:         Susan Bernavich <susanb@WIZZARDS.NET>
Subject:      Re: More counter-intuition re traction (some token VW content)
Comments: To: "John P. Flaherty" <jflaherty@PIVOT.NET>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
              x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"

I believe thats the new law here in Oregon also. Susan Bernavich 83 diesel 'Harold'

"John P. Flaherty" wrote:

> Interesting addition to this thread. Here in Maine, a new law took effect > this winter. It requires that front wheel drive cars which use studded snow > tires must use them on all four wheels. Rear wheel drive's still just need > them on the back wheels. Any other states with similar laws? > > John Flaherty > Standish, ME > '84 GL > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dominique Cormann <kozmik@HOME.COM> > To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM <vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM> > Date: Sunday, December 26, 1999 2:57 AM > Subject: Re: More counter-intuition re traction (some token VW content) > > >On Sun, 26 Dec 1999 01:40:08 -0500 > >Judith Barr/Leo Girard <lgirard@BMTS.COM> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> I have been interested in the discussion re tire width & traction. It > >> reminded me of another counter-intuitive statement I read about two years > >> ago re snow tires on front wheel drive vehicles. > >> This was attributed to a race car driver of some repute (I forget the > name > >> at the moment). He said if you were to put TWO snows on a front wheel > drive > >> vehicle they should go on the BACK. Make sense to anyone? > > > >I've heard this. If you put them on the front, the front gets to much > >traction and the rear end flys around oversteering easily. > > > >People who would rather understeer then oversteer tend to want to put > >them on the rear. > > > >Personally I would rather be able to steer, and I'll deal with the > >oversteer, so I'd put them on the front. > > > >IMHO there isn't a right way to do this, it just depends on which you > >dislike more. over or understeer. > > > >-- > >============================================================--------- > >Dominique Cormann Email: kozmik@home.com > >Homepage: http://kozmik.guelph.on.ca > >Diesel page: http://kozmik.guelph.on.ca/gtdproject > >84 Rabbit D - daily driver 84 Rabbit GTD - work'in on it > >


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main VANAGON page

Please note - During the past 17 years of operation, several gigabytes of Vanagon mail messages have been archived. Searching the entire collection will take up to five minutes to complete. Please be patient!


Return to the archives @ gerry.vanagon.com


The vanagon mailing list archives are copyright (c) 1994-2011, and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of the list administrators. Posting messages to this mailing list grants a license to the mailing list administrators to reproduce the message in a compilation, either printed or electronic. All compilations will be not-for-profit, with any excess proceeds going to the Vanagon mailing list.

Any profits from list compilations go exclusively towards the management and operation of the Vanagon mailing list and vanagon mailing list web site.