Data: trip #1 with o2 sensor connected: 140 =
miles
/9.683 gal= 14.46 mpg
trip #2 with o2 sensor dc'd: 140 miles/ 10.316 =
gal=13.57
mpg
difference, I think the fuel economy is actually =
better with
the sensor dc'd, but I can test that later.
I was truly hoping the fuel economy would improve =
by dc ing
the o2 sensor. I'd like to know what is "average" for a 84 =
westy.
Average-as in across the board if you toss out the 10 % that are =
excessively
high and the 10% that are excessively low.
End result in mpg testing is that when my family =
goes to
Florida next week, we have to take the 97 Suburban now because the mpg =
is
better...(wife giving her victory snicker in background).
Question: If the o2 sensor gives the ecu feedback =
and (yadda
yadda) gives you the best mpg, AND I am comfortable with the very =
minimal mpg
loss with it dc'd, can I run without it forever without hurting =
anything since
it drastically improves the driveability as above???
I can't wait to hear the thoughts of the =
list.
Jay in Seymour =
Indiana