Can you please explain the math for me = on how this could possibly be so?  The transmission takes the rpms of the = engine and gears it down to less revolutions.  If you have the same = transmission, the rpms of the engine can't possibly change for the same = speed.
 
Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Keezer
To: vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM =
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 = 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Tight = valves!

The problem = prone WBX valve adjust issue is one more good reason to be kind
to yourself = and transplant a better powerplant.I went thru a week of
adjusting the = valves on a friends Vanagon after replacing the heads. First
they were = too tight, then too loose, and finally after 1/2 turn, they were
quiet. But, = it won't pass emissions at idle. A valve is probably out of
adjustment. =

I have a 2.0 Golf engine from a 95 Golf in my 82 Westfalia and you don't =
have to go thru all this valve nonsense when you change the head, = which is
easier, BTW.

Reliability, power an economy is what this = engine is all about. Not the kind
of power that will transform your vanagon = into a hotrod, but there is more
than you have now in your WBX. =
Merging into traffic is effortless, not so on every WBX I have driven.

And, = the 2.0 I-4 turns out higher mph for the same rpms as a WBX.
In either the = manual or shift.

For example, in both the 85 Automatic Westy and 87 = manual Westy currently
available to me, 70 mph is 4000 rpm=I was = surprised to find that the manual
has the same rpm as the auto.
For the I-4 = 2.0 powered manual shift Westy-70 mph is 3600 rpm.
And at 4000 rpm-80 = mph. 10 more mph for the same rpm.  

Robert
1982 Westfalia = 2.0 Golf lll engine
Seattle =