He isn't saying that =
polution is
good, or that we shouldn't do anything about it. He isn't saying =
that
polution isn't worse in other places than Minn. What he is =
saying is
that a five year study showed that vehicle testing did not help. =
I
haven't looked at the study, so I can't comment on the science, but if =
it was
done properly, more states should look into it.
Just because it seems =
obvious that
something is so doesn't make it so. Emissions testing seems like =
an
obvious step to curb polution, but does it really help? =
According to
Minn., maybe not. Which uses more energy -- washing dishes in a =
sink or
in a dishwasher? If you think the dishwasher uses more energy =
then you
have chosen the obvious -- and wrong -- answer. Money and time =
spent on
"feel good" solutions that don't work is not only a waste, it diverts =
us from
finding solutions that do work.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
mayby you have never visited los angeles, =
houston, mexico
city, bangkok, jakarta, rome, athens, bejing etc etc etc. =
-----Original =
Message-----
From:
pederparizek <pederparizek@QWEST.NET>
=
Now I know that I am new to the list and =
everything, so I
don't want to upset any tree huggers out there, but emission tests =
are a
fraud. We had them instituted in Minnesota about 7 years ago. The =
state did
a study over the next five years that showed that the emissions in =
the state
did nothing. That's right, they did nothing, neither went up or =
down. So the
state, in one of it's more intelligent moves, stopped testing =
vehicles.
That's right, I don't have to pay the $15 fee once a year, have =
idiots mess
with my car, or sit in a line for an hour. All of you out there =
should
petition your state government to get rid of these hassles, I mean =
tests.
Tell them to look at what they did in Minnesota.