I'm not sure. I have had problems with Hotmail being able to deliver messages with a certain size, links, etc... but thought the delivery system of Excite was much more efficient. I'm into mp3's and use it to shuttle ideas between my band mates. Some files can get big, especially in stereo. Just my experience as of the past year or so...

AB

Mark Dorm wrote:

 
 

Excite was the first email service I used, and I found it take too long, I was happier with hotmail because in comparison it was much quicker. Has it changed in the last two years speedwise?
 

Unity One Coalition. Our goals: To create a unified federal world government. To build a tollway and bridge system that encircles the globe and joins the continents. To use the resources of the rainforest to build exotic homes for the poor. To prepare mankind for the colonization of the universe. To adapt mankind to a diet of freeze dried fermented pulverized italian roaches, and canned chewed tall fescue grass regurgitated by pigmy chimpanzees living in factories.>From: "andrewbell" 
>To: "Mark Dorm" , "vanagon@GERRY.VANAGON.COM" 
>Subject: Re: Hotmail is Slow Mail
>Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:29:13 -0500
>
>Excite is lickety-split! Easy, too!
>
>AB
>
>Mark Dorm wrote:
>
> > Hotmail is now so hideously slow I can't even enjoy reading the list anymore
> > because now I have to wait hours just to let the back button get back to the
> > list, and it hangs up when I'm scrolling down the list ect ect ect. The old
> > hotmail was good enough. The makers of the new hotmail deserve to be shot by
> > the people who lost money in the dotcom melt down.
> >
> > So can anyone recommend a fast email service? Or at least a tolerable one?
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>



Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com